DBMS > H2 vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage

System Properties Comparison H2 vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare H2 and Microsoft Azure Table Storage with Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL and MongoDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Full-featured RDBMS with a small footprint, either embedded into a Java application or used as a database server.

A Wide Column Store for rapid development using massive semi-structured datasets

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Wide column store

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.19
Rank	#48	Overall
	#31	Relational DBMS

Score	2.63
Rank	#94	Overall
	#7	Wide column stores

Website

www.h2database.com

azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/tables

Technical documentation

www.h2database.com/html/main.html

Developer

Thomas Mueller

Microsoft

Initial release

2005

2012

Current release

2.2.220, July 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

dual-licence (Mozilla public license, Eclipse public license)

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java VM

hosted

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

Java

.Net
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Java Stored Procedures and User-Defined Functions

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

Implicit feature of the cloud service

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

With clustering: 2 database servers on different computers operate on identical copies of a database

yes

implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant.

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

optimistic locking

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights based on private key authentication or shared access signatures

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

How to use Azure Table storage in .Net
10 July 2024, InfoWorld

AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud in 2025: Cloud Comparison
6 April 2025, Cloudwards.net

Working with Azure to Use and Manage Data Lakes
23 July 2024, Simplilearn.com

How to Use C# Azure.Data.Tables SDK with Azure Cosmos DB
9 July 2021, HackerNoon

Inside Azure File Storage
7 October 2015, Microsoft Azure

provided by Google News

Share this page