DBMS > Graph Engine vs. SvectorDB

System Properties Comparison Graph Engine vs. SvectorDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Graph Engine and SvectorDB with Databricks, SQLite and Redis.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A distributed in-memory data processing engine, underpinned by a strongly-typed RAM store and a general distributed computation engine

Serverless cloud-native vector database

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
Key-value store

Vector DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.52
Rank	#243	Overall
	#21	Graph DBMS
	#34	Key-value stores

Score	0.00
Rank	#382	Overall
	#21	Vector DBMS

Website

www.graphengine.io

svectordb.com

Technical documentation

www.graphengine.io/docs/manual

www.svectordb.com/docs

Developer

Microsoft

SvectorDB

Initial release

2010

2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

.NET and C

Server operating systems

.NET

server-less

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

string, double, vector

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP API

OpenAPI 3.0, RESTful HTTP API, Python SDK, JavaScript / TypeScript SDK

Supported programming languages

C#
C++
F#
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

optional: either by committing a write-ahead log (WAL) to the local persistent storage or by dumping the memory to a persistent storage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Open source Microsoft Graph Engine takes on Neo4j
13 February 2017, InfoWorld

Trinity
30 October 2010, Microsoft

Microsoft Demos New Office 365 and SharePoint Online Collaboration Technologies
3 March 2014, Redmondmag.com

The graph analytics landscape 2019
27 February 2019, Data Science Central

IBM releases Graph, a service that can outperform SQL databases
27 July 2016, GeekWire

provided by Google News

Share this page