DBMS > Graph Engine vs. RethinkDB vs. Typesense

System Properties Comparison Graph Engine vs. RethinkDB vs. Typesense

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A distributed in-memory data processing engine, underpinned by a strongly-typed RAM store and a general distributed computation engine

DBMS for the Web with a mechanism to push updated query results to applications in realtime.

A typo-tolerant, in-memory search engine optimized for instant search-as-you-type experiences and developer productivity

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
Key-value store

Document store

Search engine

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.53
Rank	#240	Overall
	#21	Graph DBMS
	#34	Key-value stores

Score	2.33
Rank	#104	Overall
	#19	Document stores

Score	0.81
Rank	#205	Overall
	#14	Search engines

Website

www.graphengine.io

rethinkdb.com

typesense.org

Technical documentation

www.graphengine.io/docs/manual

rethinkdb.com/docs

typesense.org/docs

Developer

Microsoft

The Linux Foundation

since July 2017

Initial release

2010

2009

2015

Current release

2.4.1, August 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

Open Source

Apache Version 2

Open Source

GPL V3

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

.NET and C

C++

Server operating systems

.NET

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

pre-defined schema optional

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

string, binary, float, bool, date, geometry

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

C#
C++
F#
Visual Basic

community-supported driver
C#

community-supported driver
C++

community-supported driver
Clojure

community-supported driver
Dart

community-supported driver
Erlang

community-supported driver
Go

community-supported driver
Haskell

community-supported driver
Java

official driver
JavaScript (Node.js)

official driver
Lisp

community-supported driver
Lua

community-supported driver
Objective-C

community-supported driver
Perl

community-supported driver
PHP

community-supported driver
Python

official driver
Ruby

official driver
Scala

community-supported driver

.Net

community maintained
Clojure

community maintained
Dart

community maintained
Go

community maintained
Java

community maintained
JavaScript
Perl

community maintained
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust

community maintained
Swift

community maintained

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Client-side triggers through changefeeds

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

Sharding

range based

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication using RAFT

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic single-document operations

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

MVCC based

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

optional: either by committing a write-ahead log (WAL) to the local persistent storage or by dumping the memory to a persistent storage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

users and table-level permissions

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Meet some database management systems you are likely to hear more about in the future
4 August 2014, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Trinity
30 October 2010, Microsoft

The graph analytics landscape 2019
27 February 2019, Data Science Central

IBM releases Graph, a service that can outperform SQL databases
27 July 2016, GeekWire

thatDot launches Quine, a streaming graph engine
23 February 2022, TechCrunch

Hey, corporate types. Microsoft would really love to pick your brains about Project Cortex
5 November 2019, The Register

provided by Google News

How to Use RethinkDB with Node.js Applications
16 December 2015, SitePoint

An introduction to building realtime apps with RethinkDB
4 June 2015, devm.io

Installing and Using RethinkDB on Ubuntu
8 April 2022, Open Source For You

5 Databases That You Can Use For Free
11 July 2021, Towards Data Science

NoSQL Software Market May See Big Move | MongoDB, MarkLogic, RethinkDB
10 June 2022, openPR

provided by Google News

Serverless Search using Laravel and the Typesense Cloud
22 September 2024, Laravel News

Building fast, fuzzy site search with Laravel and Typesense
29 July 2024, Laravel News

11 Open-Source SaaS Killer — Selfhost With Docker -3
7 October 2024, Medium

Laravel Scout Adds Typesense, A Lightening-fast Open-source Search
17 January 2024, Laravel News

8 Open-source Projects to Help Your Business Run Efficiently
5 April 2022, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Share this page