DB-EnginesInfluxDB download bannerEnglish
Deutsch
Knowledge Base of Relational and NoSQL Database Management Systemsprovided by solid IT

DBMS > Google Search Appliance vs. OrigoDB vs. TerarkDB

System Properties Comparison Google Search Appliance vs. OrigoDB vs. TerarkDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
NameGoogle Search Appliance  Xexclude from comparisonOrigoDB  Xexclude from comparisonTerarkDB  Xexclude from comparison
DescriptionThe Google Search Appliance consists of hardware and software for indexing documents in local networks.A fully ACID in-memory object graph databaseA key-value store forked from RocksDB with advanced compression algorithms. It can be used standalone or as a storage engine for MySQL and MongoDB
Primary database modelSearch engineDocument store
Object oriented DBMS
Key-value store
DB-Engines Ranking infomeasures the popularity of database management systemsranking trend
Trend Chart
Score2.77
Rank#94  Overall
#10  Search engines
Score0.04
Rank#332  Overall
#46  Document stores
#18  Object oriented DBMS
Score0.06
Rank#315  Overall
#54  Key-value stores
Websiteenterprise.google.com/­search/­products/­gsa.htmlorigodb.comgithub.com/­Terark/­terarkdb
Technical documentationsupport.google.com/­gsaorigodb.com/­docsgithub.com/­Terark/­terarkdb/­wiki
DeveloperGoogleRobert Friberg et alTerark
Initial release20022009 infounder the name LiveDB2016
License infoCommercial or Open SourcecommercialOpen Sourcecommercial inforestricted open source version available
Cloud-based only infoOnly available as a cloud servicenonono
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) infoDatabase as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation languageC#C++
Server operating systemsLinux
Windows
Data schemeyesschema-free
Typing infopredefined data types such as float or dateUser defined using .NET types and collectionsno
XML support infoSome form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.nono infocan be achieved using .NETno
Secondary indexesyesno
SQL infoSupport of SQLnonono
APIs and other access methodsAdministrative API
Browser interface
HTTP API
.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ
C++ API
Java API
Supported programming languages.NetC++
Java
Server-side scripts infoStored proceduresyesno
Triggersyes infoDomain Eventsno
Partitioning methods infoMethods for storing different data on different nodesShardinghorizontal partitioning infoclient side managed; servers are not synchronizednone
Replication methods infoMethods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodesMaster-slave replicationMaster-slave replicationnone
MapReduce infoOffers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methodsnonono
Foreign keys infoReferential integritynodepending on modelno
Transaction concepts infoSupport to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of dataACIDno
Concurrency infoSupport for concurrent manipulation of datayesyesyes
Durability infoSupport for making data persistentyesyes infoWrite ahead logyes
In-memory capabilities infoIs there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.noyesyes
User concepts infoAccess controlUser authentication via various security protocolsRole based authorizationno

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources
Google Search ApplianceOrigoDBTerarkDB
Recent citations in the news

the only magazine, website and conference dedicated to news, trends and case studies in knowledge management, content management and document management.
9 November 2019, KMWorld Magazine

Elastic Is Looking a Lot Like Google 10 Years Ago
10 June 2019, Motley Fool

Google Search Appliance May Be Gone, But Category Lives On
27 May 2016, Fortune

Google Search Appliance Fades Away
9 February 2016, CMSWire

Cognitive Data Management Market SWOT Analysis by Leading Key Players – IBM, Salesforce, SAP SE, Informatica, SAS
5 November 2019, Galus Australis

provided by Google News

SuperSocket: Making Socket Programming in .NET Simpler
8 October 2014, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

A Chinese company is making the cloud 200x faster
3 July 2017, TechNode

ByteDance eyes big data push with Terark acquisition
30 April 2019, EJ Insight

Terark, A Chinese Startup, May Have Just Revolutionized How Data Is Stored, Accessed & Analyzed
26 June 2017, Indiatimes.com

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

eComm Channel Merchandiser, Zoro
Zoro Tools, Chicago, IL

Principal Middleware Automation Engineer
Discover Financial Services, Riverwoods, IL

Lead Middleware Engineer
Discover Financial Services, Riverwoods, IL

IT Architect
New York City DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM, Brooklyn, NY

jobs by Indeed




Share this page

Featured Products

Neo4j logo

Get your free copy of the new O'Reilly book Graph Algorithms with 20+ examples for
machine learning, graph analytics and more.


Datastax logo

Build data-driven applications that set the standard for performance, availability,
& scale with DataStax.
Learn more.

Couchbase logo

SQL + JSON + NoSQL.
Power, flexibility & scale.
All open source.
Get started now.

Redis logo

Hosted, serverless DBaaS
in 3 steps.

30MB Free!
Start now.

RavenDB logo

Setup a fully managed RavenDB Cloud Database in minutes. Enjoy hosting, management, backups all in one place.
Grab a Free Instance

Present your product here