DBMS > GeoSpock vs. JaguarDB vs. OrientDB

System Properties Comparison GeoSpock vs. JaguarDB vs. OrientDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Spatial and temporal data processing engine for extreme data scale

Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications

Multi-model DBMS (Document, Graph, Key/Value)

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Document store
Graph DBMS
Key-value store

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.20
Rank	#277	Overall
	#130	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#334	Overall
	#53	Key-value stores

Score	5.13
Rank	#68	Overall
	#10	Document stores
	#3	Graph DBMS
	#9	Key-value stores

Website

geospock.com

www.datajaguar.com

orientdb.org

Technical documentation

docs.geospock.com/Content/Home.htm

www.datajaguar.com/support.php

www.orientdb.com/docs/last/index.html

Developer

GeoSpock

DataJaguar, Inc.

OrientDB LTD; CallidusCloud; SAP

Initial release

2015

2010

Current release

2.0, September 2019

2.9.4 September 2018

3.1.0, June 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

GPL V3.0

Open Source

Apache version 2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java, Javascript

C++

the server part. Clients available in other languages

Java

Server operating systems

hosted

Linux

All OS with a Java JDK (>= JDK 6)

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Schema can be enforced for whole record ("schema-full") or for some fields only ("schema-hybrid")

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

temporal, categorical

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

ANSI SQL for query only (using Presto)

A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented

but no views, foreign keys, triggers

SQL-like query language, no joins

APIs and other access methods

JDBC

JDBC
ODBC

Tinkerpop technology stack with Blueprints, Gremlin, Pipes
Java API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

.Net
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Java, Javascript

Triggers

Hooks

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Automatic sharding

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

could be achieved with distributed queries

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

relationship in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users can be defined per table

rights management via user accounts

Access rights for users and roles; record level security configurable

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

SQL support, group by, order by, join
» more

Competitive advantages

Extremely easy to scale-out (in seconds) 100,000 times faster
» more

Typical application scenarios

IoT data, time series data, AI data. Any type of numerical data.
» more

Key customers

Quantea, 2PiDay, Synqy, SinoLogistics, IIVI
» more

Market metrics

Advertising awareness, installed base, brand image, market share
» more

Licensing and pricing models

Free-trial license, per-node license, and subscription license.
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Graph DBMS increased their popularity by 500% within the last 2 years
3 March 2015, Paul Andlinger

Graph DBMSs are gaining in popularity faster than any other database category
21 January 2014, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

How GeoSpock is supercharging geospatial analytics
23 February 2021, ComputerWeekly.com

GeoSpock looks to unlock blockchain benefits for cities following $5.4 million investment
7 October 2020, Cities Today

GeoSpock joins Tomorrow Street to accelerate next-generation database technology adoption
28 October 2020, RealWire

UK data analytics startup GeoSpock raises $5.4 million in fresh funds
2 October 2020, Tech.eu

NTT DoCoMo makes logical investment in GeoSpock
5 October 2020, TelecomTV

provided by Google News

Graph Database Market by Technology, Application & Geography – Analysis & Forecast to 2027 || Neo Technology, Inc., OrientDB, Franz Inc.(AllegroGraph), DataStax, Ontotext AD, ArangoDB GmbH
17 February 2021, The Courier

Graph Database Market Status & Trend Analysis 2017-2026 (COVID-19 Version) | IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph.
25 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph Database Market Latest Technological Advancements 2026: IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph. – NeighborWebSJ
22 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph Database Market 2021 Global Share, Growth by Company Overview – Tibco Software, Neo4j, AWS, Microsoft, OrientDB Ltd, triAGENS GmbH(Arango DB), Cray, MarkLogic, Franz Inc(AllegroGraph), Bitnine Global, Cayley, Twitter(FlockDB), Teradata(SQL-GR), IBM, SAP, Apache, Oracle, Titan, Marklogic, HyperGraphDB, Datastax
25 February 2021, NY Market Reports

Graph Database: How Technology is upgrading the Industry – IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph.
24 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Sales Engineer
Neo4j, San Mateo, CA

Sr Associate, Database Administrator
KPMG, Atlanta, GA

Sales Director, Channel Sales
TigerGraph, California

Software Engineer – Digital Solutions
NV Energy, Reno, NV

Sr. Sales Engineer
Neo4j, New Jersey

jobs by

Share this page