DBMS > GBase vs. TinkerGraph

System Properties Comparison GBase vs. TinkerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare GBase and TinkerGraph with PostgreSQL and Neo4j.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Widely used RDBMS in China, including analytical, transactional, distributed transactional, and cloud-native data warehousing.

A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.49
Rank	#142	Overall
	#64	Relational DBMS

Score	0.05
Rank	#356	Overall
	#37	Graph DBMS

Website

www.gbase.cn

tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#tinkergraph-gremlin

Developer

General Data Technology Co., Ltd.

Initial release

2004

2009

Current release

GBase 8a, GBase 8s, GBase 8c

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, Java, Python

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Standard with numerous extensions

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
C API
JDBC
ODBC

TinkerPop 3

Supported programming languages

Groovy
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning (by range, list and hash) and vertical partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

optional

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune
3 June 2024, Amazon Web Services

Automated testing of Amazon Neptune data access with Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
28 September 2022, Amazon Web Services

Figure 6: Performance of Dijkstra's algorithm in Property Graph...
7 February 2018, ResearchGate

provided by Google News

Share this page