DBMS > GBase vs. ObjectBox vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison GBase vs. ObjectBox vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An analytical database for business intelligence with large customers in China.

Extremely fast embedded database for small devices, IoT and Mobile

A drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-grade features.

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.04
Rank	#190	Overall
	#88	Relational DBMS

Score	1.22
Rank	#172	Overall
	#5	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.55
Rank	#253	Overall
	#39	Document stores

Score	47.84
Rank	#21	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

www.gbase.cn

objectbox.io

www.percona.com/mongodb/software/percona-server-for-mongodb

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

docs.objectbox.io

docs.percona.com/percona-distribution-for-mongodb

docs.teradata.com

Developer

ObjectBox Limited

Percona

Teradata

Initial release

2017

2015

1984

Current release

GBase 8a

3.4.10-2.10, November 2017

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Open Source

GPL Version 2

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

Android
iOS
Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

Proprietary native API

proprietary protocol using JSON

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Dart
Go
Java
JavaScript

planned (as of Jan 2019)
Kotlin
Python

planned (as of Jan 2019)
Swift

Actionscript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
ColdFusion
D
Dart
Delphi
Erlang
Go
Groovy
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Perl
PHP
PowerShell
Prolog
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Smalltalk

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

JavaScript

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

online/offline synchronization between client and server

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

via In-Memory Engine

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes

Access rights for users and roles

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

News

In-Memory Database Use Cases
15 February 2024

Data Viewer for Objects – announcing ObjectBox Admin
14 November 2023

Vector Databases for Edge AI
9 August 2023

Vector Database Release for Flutter / Dart + Python
13 June 2023

SQLite and SQLite alternatives – a comprehensive overview
7 June 2023

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

A Quick Look at Open Source Databases for Mobile App Development
29 April 2018, Open Source For You

The Megashift Towards Decentralized Edge Computing
27 August 2021, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

5 Reasons to Run MongoDB on Kubernetes
6 March 2024, The New Stack

FerretDB goes GA: Gives you MongoDB, without the MongoDB...
15 May 2023, The Stack

Percona launches management system aimed at open-source databases
17 May 2022, The Register

How to Plan Your MongoDB Upgrade
29 January 2024, The New Stack

Is database-as-a-service in Percona's future?
23 May 2022, VentureBeat

provided by Google News

The Analyst Verdict: Teradata In The Eyes Of 8 Experts - Teradata (NYSE:TDC)
15 April 2024, Benzinga

Teradata's (TDC) Anaconda Partnership to Aid Portfolio Strength
11 April 2024, Yahoo Finance

Anaconda and Teradata partner to enhance open-source support for AI innovation
12 April 2024, CloudTech News

The past five years for Teradata (NYSE:TDC) investors has not been profitable
11 April 2024, Simply Wall St

Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC Has $21.71 Million Holdings in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
14 April 2024, Defense World

provided by Google News

Share this page