DBMS > Firebird vs. Hazelcast vs. Lovefield vs. WakandaDB

System Properties Comparison Firebird vs. Hazelcast vs. Lovefield vs. WakandaDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Firebird is an open source RDBMS forked from Borland's InterBase

A widely adopted in-memory data grid

Embeddable relational database for web apps written in pure JavaScript

WakandaDB is embedded in a server that provides a REST API and a server-side javascript engine to access data

Primary database model

Secondary database models

Document store

JSON support with IMDG 3.12

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	19.46
Rank	#30	Overall
	#18	Relational DBMS

Score	5.72
Rank	#59	Overall
	#6	Key-value stores

Score	0.22
Rank	#306	Overall
	#138	Relational DBMS

Score	0.03
Rank	#364	Overall
	#17	Object oriented DBMS

Website

www.firebirdsql.org

hazelcast.com

google.github.io/lovefield

wakanda.github.io

Technical documentation

www.firebirdsql.org/en/reference-manuals

hazelcast.org/imdg/docs

github.com/google/lovefield/blob/master/docs/spec_index.md

wakanda.github.io/doc

Developer

Firebird Foundation

Hazelcast

Google

Wakanda SAS

Initial release

2000

As fork of Borland's InterBase

2008

2014

2012

Current release

5.0.1, August 2024

5.3.6, November 2023

2.1.12, February 2017

2.7.0 (April 29, 2019), April 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Initial Developer's Public License

Open Source

Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

AGPLv3, extended commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Java

JavaScript

C++, JavaScript

Server operating systems

AIX
FreeBSD
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
server-less

Firebird Embedded Server
Solaris
Unix
Windows

All OS with a Java VM

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

tested with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

the object must implement a serialization strategy

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

via JavaScript builder pattern

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
C/C++ API
JDBC

Jaybird
ODBC
OLE DB

JCache
JPA
Memcached protocol
RESTful HTTP API

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Delphi
Java
JavaScript

Node.js
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

.Net
C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Scala

JavaScript

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

PSQL

yes

Event Listeners, Executor Services

yes

Triggers

yes

Events

Using read-only observers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

Replicated Map

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency selectable by user

Raft Consensus Algorithm

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

one or two-phase-commit; repeatable reads; read commited

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Features a multi-generational MVCC architecture, readers do not block writers

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, by using IndexedDB or the cloud service Firebase Realtime Database

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

using MemoryDB

User concepts

Access control

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

Role-based access control

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Firebird – Director, Data Science (US)
26 September 2024, Music Business Worldwide

12 Top Open Source Databases to Consider
1 May 2024, TechTarget

Acosta Sales & Marketing Acquires Firebird Foods
7 September 2024, Supermarket News

Coachella Valley Firebirds @ Hershey Bears Friday, June 14, 2024 | TheAHL.com
13 June 2024, American Hockey League

DoNot Team's New Firebird Backdoor Hits Pakistan and Afghanistan
23 October 2023, The Hacker News

provided by Google News

Hazelcast embraces vector search
30 July 2024, Blocks & Files

Hazelcast 5.4 real time data processing platform boosts AI and consistency
17 April 2024, VentureBeat

Event Stream Processing Market Exploring Future Growth 2023-2032 and Key Players - Cloudera, Inc., Hazelcast,
24 September 2024, EIN News

Hazelcast Expands Global Partner Program to Support Mission-Critical, AI Application Projects
20 August 2024, PR Newswire

Hazelcast Weaves Wider Logic Threads Through The Data Fabric
7 March 2024, Forbes

provided by Google News

Share this page