DBMS > FeatureBase vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison FeatureBase vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare FeatureBase and OrigoDB with CockroachDB and etcd.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Real-time database platform that powers real-time analytics and machine learning applications by simultaneously executing low-latency, high-throughput, and highly concurrent workloads.

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.26
Rank	#304	Overall
	#138	Relational DBMS

Score	0.03
Rank	#378	Overall
	#51	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Website

www.featurebase.com

origodb.com

Technical documentation

docs.featurebase.com

origodb.com/docs

Developer

Molecula and Pilosa Open Source Contributors

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2017

2009

under the name LiveDB

Current release

2022, May 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL queries

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
JDBC
Kafka Connector
ODBC

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

Java
Python

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes, using Linux fsync

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Molecula Austin Office: Careers, Perks + Culture
15 November 2023, Built In Austin

Get Your Infrastructure Ready for Real-Time Analytics
8 March 2022, Built In

Funding wrap: H.O. Maycotte's Molecula raises $10M, rebrands; UT snags $15M to lead regional innovation hub
12 September 2022, The Business Journals

The 10 Coolest Big Data Tools Of 2021
7 December 2021, CRN

Pilosa: A Scalable High Performance Bitmap Database Index
17 June 2019, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Share this page