DBMS > Faircom DB vs. QuestDB vs. RocksDB

System Properties Comparison Faircom DB vs. QuestDB vs. RocksDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Native high-speed multi-model DBMS for relational and key-value store data simultaneously accessible through SQL and NoSQL APIs.

A high performance open source SQL database for time series data

Embeddable persistent key-value store optimized for fast storage (flash and RAM)

Primary database model

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.18
Rank	#351	Overall
	#53	Key-value stores
	#148	Relational DBMS

Score	1.89
Rank	#146	Overall
	#11	Time Series DBMS

Score	4.57
Rank	#87	Overall
	#13	Key-value stores

Website

www.faircom.com/products/faircom-db

questdb.io

rocksdb.org

Technical documentation

learn.faircomcorp.com/developers/documentation_directory

questdb.io/docs/introduction

github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki

Developer

FairCom Corporation

QuestDB Limited

Facebook, Inc.

Initial release

1979

2014

2013

Current release

V12, November 2020

7.10.2, March 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Restricted, free version available

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

BSD

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

ANSI C, C++

Java

C++

Server operating systems

AIX
FreeBSD
HP-UX
Linux
NetBSD
OS X
QNX
SCO
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

easily portable to other OSs

Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux

Data scheme

schema free, schema optional, schema required, partial schema,

yes

schema-free via InfluxDB Line Protocol

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, ANSI SQL Types, JSON, typed binary structures

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, ANSI SQL with proprietary extensions

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
Direct SQL
JDBC
JPA
ODBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful MQTT/JSON API
RPC

HTTP REST
InfluxDB Line Protocol (TCP/UDP)
JDBC

C++ API
Java API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js and browser)
PHP
Python
Visual Basic

PostgreSQL driver
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

over HTTP

C
C++
Go
Java
Perl
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

.Net, JavaScript, C/C++

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

File partitioning, horizontal partitioning, sharding

Customizable business rules for table partitioning

horizontal partitioning (by timestamps)

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes, configurable to be parallel or serial, synchronous or asynchronous, uni-directional or bi-directional, ACID-consistent or eventually consistent (with custom conflict resolution).

Configurable consistency for N replicas

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency
Tunable consistency per server, database, table, and transaction

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

tunable from ACID to Eventually Consistent

ACID for single-table writes

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

Yes, tunable from durable to delayed durability to in-memory

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

through memory mapped files

yes

User concepts

Access control

Fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard with additional protections for files

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Achieve Hundreds of Thousands of Transactions Per Second on A Single Database Server...
» more

Relational model with native time series support Column based storage and time partitioned...
» more

Competitive advantages

Top Features SQL Key-value store and navigational NoSQL API Indexed binary objects...
» more

Real-time data ingestion and istant SQL queries for time series High performance...
» more

Typical application scenarios

Real-time transaction processing solutions leverage FairCom DB because its NoSQL...
» more

Application metrics Financial market data and algo trading DevOps monitoring Real-time...
» more

Key customers

Microsoft, UPS, Verizon, Motorola, Commvault, Thomson Reuters, ACI, BNY Mellon, Rockwell...
» more

Market metrics

From banking and financial transactions, transportation, warehouse automation, package...
» more

Licensing and pricing models

Just as the technical aspects of FairCom DB are flexible to meet operation requirements,...
» more

Apache 2.0.
» more

News

Loading Pandas DataFrames into QuestDB
9 March 2023

How Reliable is Your Distributed Database?
3 March 2023

Running Databases on Kubernetes
2 March 2023

The Tale of Troubleshooting: Unstable Builds and Open Source Infrastructure
1 March 2023

QuestDB 7.0 Release
28 February 2023

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.