DBMS > Faircom DB vs. ObjectBox vs. OrientDB vs. Stardog

System Properties Comparison Faircom DB vs. ObjectBox vs. OrientDB vs. Stardog

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Native high-speed multi-model DBMS for relational and key-value store data simultaneously accessible through SQL and NoSQL APIs.

Extremely fast embedded database for small devices, IoT and Mobile

Multi-model DBMS (Document, Graph, Key/Value)

Enterprise Knowledge Graph platform and graph DBMS with high availability, high performance reasoning, and virtualization

Primary database model

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Object oriented DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Key-value store

Graph DBMS
RDF store

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.43
Rank	#240	Overall
	#38	Key-value stores
	#114	Relational DBMS

Score	0.75
Rank	#195	Overall
	#9	Object oriented DBMS

Score	5.13
Rank	#68	Overall
	#10	Document stores
	#3	Graph DBMS
	#9	Key-value stores

Score	1.46
Rank	#137	Overall
	#10	Graph DBMS
	#6	RDF stores

Website

www.faircom.com/products/faircom-db

objectbox.io

orientdb.org

www.stardog.com

Technical documentation

learn.faircomcorp.com/developers/documentation_directory

docs.objectbox.io

www.orientdb.com/docs/last/index.html

docs.stardog.com

Developer

FairCom Corporation

ObjectBox Limited

OrientDB LTD; CallidusCloud; SAP

Stardog-Union

Initial release

1979

2017

2010

Current release

V12, November 2020

3.1.0, June 2020

7.3.0, May 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Restricted, free version available

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Open Source

Apache version 2

commercial

60-day fully-featured trial license; 1-year fully-featured non-commercial use license for academics/students

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

ANSI C, C++

C and C++

Java

Server operating systems

AIX
FreeBSD
HP-UX
Linux
NetBSD
OS X
QNX
SCO
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

easily portable to other OSs

Android
iOS
Linux
macOS
Windows

All OS with a Java JDK (>= JDK 6)

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

schema free, schema optional, schema required, partial schema,

yes

schema-free

Schema can be enforced for whole record ("schema-full") or for some fields only ("schema-hybrid")

schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, ANSI SQL Types, JSON, typed binary structures

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Import/export of XML data possible

Secondary indexes

yes

supports real-time indexing in full-text and geospatial

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, ANSI SQL with proprietary extensions

SQL-like query language, no joins

Yes, compatible with all major SQL variants through dedicated BI/SQL Server

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
Direct SQL
JDBC
JPA
ODBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful MQTT/JSON API
RPC

Proprietary native API

Tinkerpop technology stack with Blueprints, Gremlin, Pipes
Java API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

GraphQL query language
HTTP API
Jena RDF API
OWL
RDF4J API
Sesame REST HTTP Protocol
SNARL
SPARQL
Spring Data
Stardog Studio
TinkerPop 3

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js and browser)
PHP
Python
Visual Basic

C
C++
Dart
Go
Java
JavaScript

planned (as of Jan 2019)
Kotlin
Python

planned (as of Jan 2019)
Swift

.Net
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

.Net
Clojure
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

.Net, JavaScript, C/C++

Java, Javascript

user defined functions and aggregates, HTTP Server extensions in Java

Triggers

yes

Hooks

yes

via event handlers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

File partitioning, horizontal partitioning, sharding

Customizable business rules for table partitioning

none

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes, configurable to be parallel or serial, synchronous or asynchronous, uni-directional or bi-directional, ACID-consistent or eventually consistent (with custom conflict resolution).

online/offline synchronization between client and server

Multi-source replication

Multi-source replication in HA-Cluster

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

could be achieved with distributed queries

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency
Tunable consistency per server, database, table, and transaction

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency in HA-Cluster

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

relationship in graphs

yes

relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

tunable from ACID to Eventually Consistent

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

Yes, tunable from durable to delayed durability to in-memory

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard with additional protections for files

yes

Access rights for users and roles; record level security configurable

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Achieve Hundreds of Thousands of Transactions Per Second on A Single Database Server...
» more

Stardog is an Enterprise Knowledge Graph platform, uniquely combining graph storage...
» more

Competitive advantages

Top Features SQL Key-value store and navigational NoSQL API Indexed binary objects...
» more

Stardog provides a full featureset to aid in data integration for your complex data....
» more

Typical application scenarios

Real-time transaction processing solutions leverage FairCom DB because its NoSQL...
» more

Stardog is frequently used for: Anti-money laundering & fraud monitoring Customer...
» more

Key customers

Microsoft, UPS, Verizon, Motorola, Commvault, Thomson Reuters, ACI, BNY Mellon, Rockwell...
» more

Bosch, Dow Jones, Elsevier, Ericsson, Morgan Stanley, NASA, NIH, Nokia, Salesforce,...
» more

Market metrics

From banking and financial transactions, transportation, warehouse automation, package...
» more

Stardog's technology is based on ground-breaking research by our founders cited 10,000+...
» more

Licensing and pricing models

Just as the technical aspects of FairCom DB are flexible to meet operation requirements,...
» more

A fully-featured 60-day Trial license is available for those testing Stardog; contact...
» more

News

Flutter databases – sqflite, hive, ObjectBox, and Moor
3 February 2021

Firebase, Firebase alternatives – a look at data sync solutions
3 February 2021

ObjectBox Dart/Flutter v0.11 Database: Performance & Relations
2 February 2021

What is Data Synchronization + How to Keep Data in Sync
29 January 2021

Three small things to do some good for startups
17 December 2020

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Graph DBMS increased their popularity by 500% within the last 2 years
3 March 2015, Paul Andlinger

Graph DBMSs are gaining in popularity faster than any other database category
21 January 2014, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

FairCom to support HelloDoc
24 February 2021, KMWorld Magazine

Montepino achieves its goal of developing one million square metres for logistics space
4 November 2020, IT News Online

Thrasio Commits £200 million to Acquire UK Ecommerce and Amazon Businesses; Announces its 11th UK Acquisition
17 December 2020, IT News Online

Laird Connectivity Launches LoRaWAN-Enabled Gateway and Sensor Bundle for Prototyping IoT Applications
16 December 2020, IT News Online

Holiday Shopping Warning: Simple Typos Can Lead Consumers and Brands to Online Fraud, Counterfeit Goods, and Cyber Crime
18 November 2020, IT News Online

provided by Google News

Global Object-Oriented Databases Software Market 2021 Covid-19 Effect Analysis by Top Competitors Google, Microsoft, InterSystems, DBase, Cyebiz, VelocityDB, Paradigma Software, Actian, Viravis, ObjectBox, Objectivity, Ignite Technologies, Compose, MIOsoft, R&F Consulting etc
22 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Object-Oriented Databases Software Market In Depth Research with Statistics, Facts and Figures 2021-2026 | Google, Microsoft, InterSystems – KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper
11 February 2021, KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper

Object-Oriented Databases Software Market Size and Forecast (2021-2027) | By Top Key Players – Google, ObjectBox, Microsoft, DBase, Cyebiz, InterSystems – Express Keeper
22 February 2021, Express Keeper

Object-Oriented Databases Software Market SWOT Analysis, Top Players – Google, Microsoft, InterSystems, DBase, Cyebiz, VelocityDB, Paradigma Software
15 February 2021, The Bisouv Network

ObjectBox has built a distributed database for the IoT
17 September 2019, Stacey on IoT

provided by Google News

Graph Database Market by Technology, Application & Geography – Analysis & Forecast to 2027 || Neo Technology, Inc., OrientDB, Franz Inc.(AllegroGraph), DataStax, Ontotext AD, ArangoDB GmbH
17 February 2021, The Courier

Graph Database Market Latest Technological Advancements 2026: IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph. – NeighborWebSJ
22 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph Database Market 2021 Global Share, Growth by Company Overview – Tibco Software, Neo4j, AWS, Microsoft, OrientDB Ltd, triAGENS GmbH(Arango DB), Cray, MarkLogic, Franz Inc(AllegroGraph), Bitnine Global, Cayley, Twitter(FlockDB), Teradata(SQL-GR), IBM, SAP, Apache, Oracle, Titan, Marklogic, HyperGraphDB, Datastax
25 February 2021, NY Market Reports

Graph Database: How Technology is upgrading the Industry – IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph.
24 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph Database Market Competitive Insights and Analysis 2021-2026 | IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph.
24 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Director of Product Marketing
FairCom, Salt Lake City, UT

Director of Marketing
FairCom, Salt Lake City, UT

Digital Media Intern
ObjectBox GmbH, United States

Sales Engineer
Neo4j, San Mateo, CA

Sr Associate, Database Administrator
KPMG, Atlanta, GA

Software Engineer – Digital Solutions
NV Energy, Reno, NV

Sales Director, Channel Sales
TigerGraph, California

Sales Director, Partner Success
TigerGraph, California

jobs by

Share this page