DBMS > Faircom DB vs. Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Transbase

System Properties Comparison Faircom DB vs. Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Transbase

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Native high-speed multi-model DBMS for relational and key-value store data simultaneously accessible through SQL and NoSQL APIs.

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

Database as a Service offering with high compatibility to Microsoft SQL Server

A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS

Primary database model

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.15
Rank	#367	Overall
	#55	Key-value stores
	#154	Relational DBMS

Score	1.47
Rank	#174	Overall
	#86	Relational DBMS

Score	78.75
Rank	#16	Overall
	#10	Relational DBMS

Score	0.52
Rank	#274	Overall
	#128	Relational DBMS

Website

www.faircom.com/products/faircom-db

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/sql-database

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase.html

Technical documentation

learn.faircomcorp.com/developers/documentation_directory

docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase/features.html

Developer

FairCom Corporation

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

Microsoft

Transaction Software GmbH

Initial release

1979

2005

2010

1987

Current release

V12, November 2020

V12

Transbase 8.4, September 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Restricted, free version available

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

commercial

free development license

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

ANSI C, C++

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

AIX
FreeBSD
HP-UX
Linux
NetBSD
OS X
QNX
SCO
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

easily portable to other OSs

Linux
Windows

hosted

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

schema free, schema optional, schema required, partial schema,

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, ANSI SQL Types, JSON, typed binary structures

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, ANSI SQL with proprietary extensions

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
Direct SQL
JDBC
JPA
ODBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful MQTT/JSON API
RPC

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js and browser)
PHP
Python
Visual Basic

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

.Net
C#
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Objective-C
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

.Net, JavaScript, C/C++

Transact SQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

File partitioning, horizontal partitioning, sharding

Customizable business rules for table partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes, configurable to be parallel or serial, synchronous or asynchronous, uni-directional or bi-directional, ACID-consistent or eventually consistent (with custom conflict resolution).

Source-replica replication

yes, with always 3 replicas available

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency
Tunable consistency per server, database, table, and transaction

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

tunable from ACID to Eventually Consistent

ACID

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

Yes, tunable from durable to delayed durability to in-memory

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard with additional protections for files

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Achieve Hundreds of Thousands of Transactions Per Second on A Single Database Server...
» more

Competitive advantages

Top Features SQL Key-value store and navigational NoSQL API Indexed binary objects...
» more

Typical application scenarios

Real-time transaction processing solutions leverage FairCom DB because its NoSQL...
» more

Key customers

Microsoft, UPS, Verizon, Motorola, Commvault, Thomson Reuters, ACI, BNY Mellon, Rockwell...
» more

Market metrics

From banking and financial transactions, transportation, warehouse automation, package...
» more

Licensing and pricing models

Just as the technical aspects of FairCom DB are flexible to meet operation requirements,...
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2020
4 January 2021, Paul Andlinger, Matthias Gelbmann

Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates
12 December 2019, Paul Andlinger

The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years
7 February 2017, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

World's First Converged IIoT Hub to be Showcased at IoT Tech Expo
3 September 2021, Automation.com

provided by Google News

Learn To Build A Full Stack Application with Azure SQL And Prisma
13 January 2023, iProgrammer

The Dangers of Default Cloud Configurations
16 January 2023, Dark Reading

Azure Migration Strategy: Tools, Costs and Best Practices
3 February 2023, DevOps.com

Microsoft Azure Load Testing is now generally available
1 February 2023, azure.microsoft.com

Top 10 data migration tools of 2023
1 February 2023, TechRepublic

provided by Google News

Economic and biophysical limits to seaweed farming for climate ...
23 December 2022, Nature.com

SF Mulls Strict New Rules to Keep Scooters Off Sidewalks
12 September 2022, The San Francisco Standard

One City's Proposed E-Scooter Ultimatum: No Sidewalks or No ...
20 September 2022, Route Fifty

provided by Google News

Share this page