DBMS > Drizzle vs. MarkLogic vs. Vitess

System Properties Comparison Drizzle vs. MarkLogic vs. Vitess

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.

Operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database

Scalable, distributed, cloud-native DBMS, extending MySQL

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Native XML DBMS
RDF store

as of version 7
Search engine

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	4.32
Rank	#66	Overall
	#11	Document stores
	#1	Native XML DBMS
	#1	RDF stores
	#8	Search engines

Score	0.92
Rank	#197	Overall
	#92	Relational DBMS

Website

www.progress.com/marklogic

vitess.io

Technical documentation

www.progress.com/marklogic/documentation

vitess.io/docs

Developer

Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker

MarkLogic Corp.

The Linux Foundation, PlanetScale

Initial release

2008

2001

2013

Current release

7.2.4, September 2012

11.0, December 2022

15.0.2, December 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GNU GPL

commercial

restricted free version is available

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0, commercial licenses available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X

Linux
OS X
Windows

Docker
Linux
macOS

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Schema can be enforced

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

with proprietary extensions

yes

SQL92

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

JDBC

Java API
Node.js Client API
ODBC
proprietary Optic API

Proprietary Query API, introduced with version 9
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL
WebDAV
XDBC
XQuery
XSLT

ADO.NET
JDBC
MySQL protocol
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Java
PHP

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

via XQuery or JavaScript

yes

proprietary syntax

Triggers

hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via Hadoop Connector, HDFS Direct Access and in-database MapReduce jobs

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency across shards
Immediate Consistency within a shard

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

not for MyISAM storage engine

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

can act as a resource manager in an XA/JTA transaction

ACID at shard level

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

table locks or row locks depending on storage engine

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes, with Range Indexes

yes

User concepts

Access control

Pluggable authentication mechanisms

e.g. LDAP, HTTP

Role-based access control at the document and subdocument levels

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger

Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Progress Introduces MarkLogic FastTrack, Helping Organizations Harness the Power of Connected Data
23 July 2024, GlobeNewswire

Database Platform to Simplify Complex Data | Progress Marklogic
7 February 2023, Progress Software

Progress Brings Industry Leaders Together to Share Insights on AI and Data at MarkLogic World Tour US 2024
18 September 2024, StockTitan

Progress Announces Powerful New Generative AI Capabilities in Latest Release of MarkLogic Server
5 September 2024, GlobeNewswire

Progress launches MarkLogic Server 12 with new AI capabilities
9 September 2024, IT Brief Australia

provided by Google News

Deepthi Sigireddi on Distributed Database Architecture in the Cloud Native Era
20 May 2024, InfoQ.com

PlanetScale Announces $30M Series B Funding to Accelerate Adoption of Instantly Provisioned and Infinitely Scalable Database
23 June 2021, Business Wire

Update CNCF’s Vitess Scales MySQL with the Help of Kubernetes
29 March 2022, InApps Technology

They scaled YouTube — now they’ll shard everyone with PlanetScale
13 December 2018, TechCrunch

Scaling MySQL with Sam Lambert from PlanetScale
29 August 2023, substack.com

provided by Google News

Share this page