DBMS > Drizzle vs. Kinetica
System Properties Comparison Drizzle vs. Kinetica
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Drizzle Xexclude from comparison||Kinetica Xexclude from comparison|
|Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.||GPU-accelerated database for real-time analysis of large and streaming datasets|
|Primary database model||Relational DBMS||Relational DBMS|
|Developer||Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker||Kinetica|
|Current release||7.2.4, September 2012||6.0|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source GNU GPL||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Implementation language||C++||C, C++|
|Server operating systems||FreeBSD|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||yes with proprietary extensions||SQL-like DML and DDL statements|
|APIs and other access methods||JDBC||JDBC|
RESTful HTTP API
|Supported programming languages||C|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||user defined functions|
|Triggers||no hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.||yes triggers when inserted values for one or more columns fall within a specified range|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||Multi-source replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes GPU vRAM or System RAM|
|User concepts Access control||Pluggable authentication mechanisms e.g. LDAP, HTTP||Access rights for users and roles on table level|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
|Recent citations in the news|
Global GPU Database Market 2020 Top Manufacturers: Nvidia, Kinetica DB, OmniSci, Neo4j, Brytlyt etc.
Global GPU Database Market Competitors Analysis Forecast 2020 : Nvidia, Kinetica DB, OmniSci, Neo4j, Brytlyt etc.
GPU Database Market Report New Business Developments, Top Companies, Nvidia, Kinetica DB, OmniSci, Neo4j, Brytlyt
GPU Database Assessment Market SWOT Analysis, by Key Players: Nvidia, Kinetica DB, OmniSci, Neo4j, Brytlyt, BlazingDB, Zilliz, SQream, Jedox, HeteroDB, Blazegraph, H2O.ai, FASTDATA.io, Fuzzy Logix, Graphistry
GPU Database Market 2020 By Segmentation, Developments Analysis with Company Profiles – Graphistry, NVIDIA, SQream, Brytlyt, BlazingDB, Neo4j, Jedox, Zilliz, HeteroDB, Kinetica, Blazegraph, Anaconda, Fuzzy Logix, OmniSci
provided by Google News
Share this page