DBMS > Drizzle vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. JaguarDB
System Properties Comparison Drizzle vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. JaguarDB
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Drizzle Xexclude from comparison||Hawkular Metrics Xexclude from comparison||JaguarDB Xexclude from comparison|
|Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.||Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.||Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications|
|Primary database model||Relational DBMS||Time Series DBMS||Key-value store|
|Developer||Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker||Community supported by Red Hat||DataJaguar, Inc.|
|Current release||7.2.4, September 2012||2.9.4 September 2018|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source GNU GPL||Open Source Apache 2.0||Open Source GPL V3.0|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Implementation language||C++||Java||C++ the server part. Clients available in other languages|
|Server operating systems||FreeBSD|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||yes||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||yes with proprietary extensions||no||A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented but no views, foreign keys, triggers|
|APIs and other access methods||JDBC||HTTP REST||JDBC|
|Supported programming languages||C|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||no||no|
|Triggers||no hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.||yes via Hawkular Alerting||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||Sharding based on Cassandra||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||Multi-source replication|
|selectable replication factor based on Cassandra||Multi-source replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra|
Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||no||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||no||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no||no|
|User concepts Access control||Pluggable authentication mechanisms e.g. LDAP, HTTP||no||rights management via user accounts|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
|Recent citations in the news|
Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived ...
Security Bulletin 26 Oct 2022
Security Bulletin 19 Oct 2022
5 DevOps Tools for Logging and Monitoring
Interview with Tim Fox About Vert.x 3, the Original Reactive ...
provided by Google News
Share this page