DBMS > DolphinDB vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. Riak KV

System Properties Comparison DolphinDB vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. Riak KV

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

DolphinDB is a high performance Time Series DBMS. It is integrated with an easy-to-use fully featured programming language and a high-volume high-velocity streaming analytics system. It offers operational simplicity, scalability, fault tolerance, and concurrency.

Widely used in-process key-value store

Distributed, fault tolerant key-value store

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS
Vector DBMS

Key-value store

supports sorted and unsorted key sets
Native XML DBMS

in the Oracle Berkeley DB XML version

Key-value store

with links between data sets and object tags for the creation of secondary indexes

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.16
Rank	#109	Overall
	#8	Time Series DBMS
	#9	Vector DBMS

Score	1.72
Rank	#131	Overall
	#21	Key-value stores
	#3	Native XML DBMS

Score	3.21
Rank	#82	Overall
	#11	Key-value stores

Website

www.dolphindb.com

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/berkeleydb.html

Technical documentation

docs.dolphindb.cn/en/help200/index.html

docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_05/html/index.html

www.tiot.jp/riak-docs/riak/kv/latest

Developer

DolphinDB, Inc

Oracle

originally developed by Sleepycat, which was acquired by Oracle

OpenSource, formerly Basho Technologies

Initial release

2018

1994

2009

Current release

v2.00.4, January 2022

18.1.40, May 2020

3.2.0, December 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free community version available

Open Source

commercial license available

Open Source

Apache version 2, commercial enterprise edition

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C, Java, C++ (depending on the Berkeley DB edition)

Erlang

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

AIX
Android
FreeBSD
iOS
Linux
OS X
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

Linux
OS X

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

only with the Berkeley DB XML edition

Secondary indexes

yes

restricted

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

yes

SQL interfaced based on SQLite is available

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
JSON over HTTP
Kafka
MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport)
ODBC
OPC DA
OPC UA
RabbitMQ
WebSocket

HTTP API
Native Erlang Interface

Supported programming languages

C#
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript
MatLab
Python
R
Rust

.Net

Figaro is a .Net framework assembly that extends Berkeley DB XML into an embeddable database engine for .NET
others

Third-party libraries to manipulate Berkeley DB files are available for many languages
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party binding
Perl
Python
Tcl

unofficial client library
C#
C++

unofficial client library
Clojure

unofficial client library
Dart

unofficial client library
Erlang
Go

unofficial client library
Groovy

unofficial client library
Haskell

unofficial client library
Java
JavaScript

unofficial client library
Lisp

unofficial client library
Perl

unofficial client library
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

unofficial client library
Smalltalk

unofficial client library

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Erlang

Triggers

yes

only for the SQL API

yes

pre-commit hooks and post-commit hooks

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

none

Sharding

no "single point of failure"

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

selectable replication factor

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

links between data sets can be stored

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Administrators, Users, Groups

yes, using Riak Security

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Database Trends Report: SQL Beats NoSQL, MySQL Most Popular
5 March 2019, ADTmag

Which Are the Top Local Databases for React Native
15 October 2019, appinventiv.com

Fig. 2. XML Methods for Various XML DBMS Types
29 October 2024, ResearchGate

Margo I. Seltzer
12 December 2024, Berkman Klein Center

How to Set Up Virtual Domains and Virtual Users in Postfix
20 May 2016, Linux.com

provided by Google News

Basho Revamps Riak Open-Source Database
22 September 2023, InformationWeek

Is Riak A Good NoSQL Database Option For Enterprises?
1 July 2019, Analytics India Magazine

A Critique of Resizable Hash Tables: Riak Core & Random Slicing
26 August 2018, infoq.com

Will the last person at Basho please turn out the lights?
13 July 2017, theregister.com

Enterprise NoSQL Database for the IoT Becomes Open Source
12 May 2016, Engineering.com

provided by Google News

Share this page