DBMS > CrateDB vs. Linter vs. Tibero

System Properties Comparison CrateDB vs. Linter vs. Tibero

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Distributed Database based on Lucene

RDBMS for high security requirements

A secure RDBMS, designed for easy portability from Oracle

Primary database model

Document store
Spatial DBMS
Search engine
Time Series DBMS
Vector DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.67
Rank	#225	Overall
	#37	Document stores
	#5	Spatial DBMS
	#17	Search engines
	#19	Time Series DBMS
	#16	Vector DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#157	Relational DBMS

Score	1.42
Rank	#150	Overall
	#67	Relational DBMS

Website

cratedb.com

linter.ru

us.tmaxsoft.com/products/tibero

Technical documentation

cratedb.com/docs

technet.tmaxsoft.com/upload/download/online/tibero/pver-20150504-000002/index.html

Developer

Crate

relex.ru

TmaxSoft

Initial release

2013

1990

2003

Current release

5.8.1, August 2024

7, September 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C and C++

C and Assembler

Server operating systems

All Operating Systems, including Kubernetes with CrateDB Kubernetes Operator support

AIX
Android
BSD
HP Open VMS
iOS
Linux
OS X
VxWorks
Windows

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, but no triggers and constraints, and PostgreSQL compatibility

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Prometheus Remote Read/Write
RESTful HTTP API

ADO.NET
JDBC
LINQ
ODBC
OLE DB
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)

JDBC
ODBC
ODP.NET
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)
Tibero CLI

Supported programming languages

.NET
Erlang
Go

community maintained client
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

community maintained client
Perl

community maintained client
PHP
Python
R
Ruby

community maintained client
Scala

community maintained client

C
C#
C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Qt
Ruby
Tcl

C
C#
C++
Cobol
Java
Objective-C
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions (Javascript)

yes

proprietary syntax with the possibility to convert from PL/SQL

Persistent Stored Procedure (PSM)

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

horizontal partitioning

by range, hash, list or composite

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Configurable replication on table/partition-level

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Read-after-write consistency on record level

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

unique row identifiers can be used for implementing an optimistic concurrency control strategy

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

planned for next version

User concepts

Access control

rights management via user accounts

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard (SQL 92, SQL 99)

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

ABB Revolutionizes Smart Charging with OPTIMAX® Cloud, Powered by CrateDB
21 January 2025, PR Newswire

Tech Mahindra & CrateDB Forge AI-Powered Future for Smart Industries
2 April 2025, newskarnataka.com

Tech Mahindra, CrateDB Partner for Agentic AI in Industry
2 April 2025, Bisinfotech

Real-Time Analytics Database Company CrateDB Names Lars Färnström as New CEO
1 March 2023, Business Wire

Crate.io raises $10M to grow its database platform
15 June 2021, VentureBeat

provided by Google News

TmaxTibero eyes global expansion with certified DBMS tech
11 August 2024, The Korea Herald

How to Succeed at Large-Scale Mainframe Replatforming with TmaxSoft OpenFrame on AWS
2 August 2022, Amazon Web Services

AIS Partners TmaxSoft to Offer Database-as-a-Service on PaaS Cloud for Enterprise Customers
7 December 2017, The Fast Mode

Hyundai and Kia Say Good-bye to Oracle and Choose Tmax as DBMS Vendor
13 June 2019, Businesskorea

Tmax deploys advanced database management system at UITM’s disaster recovery site
30 December 2022, The Malaysian Reserve

provided by Google News

Share this page