DBMS > CrateDB vs. Derby vs. etcd vs. SAP HANA

System Properties Comparison CrateDB vs. Derby vs. etcd vs. SAP HANA

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Distributed Date Store based on Lucene

Full-featured RDBMS with a small footprint, either embedded into a Java application or used as a database server.

A distributed reliable key-value store

In-memory, column based data store. Available as appliance or cloud service

Primary database model

Relational DBMS
Search engine

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Time Series DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS

with SAP Hana, Enterprise Edition
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.97
Rank	#178	Overall
	#86	Relational DBMS
	#13	Search engines

Score	5.17
Rank	#78	Overall
	#42	Relational DBMS

Score	10.88
Rank	#47	Overall
	#5	Key-value stores

Score	55.09
Rank	#21	Overall
	#13	Relational DBMS

Website

crate.io

db.apache.org/derby

etcd.io
github.com/etcd-io/etcd

www.sap.com/products/hana.html

Technical documentation

crate.io/docs

db.apache.org/derby/manuals/index.html

etcd.io/docs
github.com/etcd-io/etcd/tree/master/Documentation

help.sap.com/hana

Developer

Crate

Apache Software Foundation

SAP

Initial release

2013

1997

2010

Current release

10.15.2.0, March 2020

3.4, August 2019

2.0 SPS05 (June 26, 2020), June 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache version 2

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

also available as a cloud based service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java 7 (and higher) VM

All OS with a Java VM

FreeBSD
Linux
Windows

experimental

Appliance or cloud-service

Data scheme

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, but no triggers and constraints

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET

community maintained client
JDBC
MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport)
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Prometheus Remote Read/Write
RESTful HTTP API

JDBC

gRPC
JSON over HTTP

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

Erlang
Go

community maintained client
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

community maintained client
Perl

community maintained client
PHP
Python
Ruby

community maintained client
Scala

community maintained client

Java

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

Java Stored Procedures

SQLScript, R

Triggers

yes

yes, watching key changes

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

yes

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

Source-replica replication

Using Raft consensus algorithm to ensure data replication with strong consistency among multiple replicas.

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Read Your Own Writes Consistency

for primary key lookups

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

unique row identifiers can be used for implementing an optimistic concurrency control strategy

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

rights management via user accounts

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

CrateDB is an open source distributed SQL database that spreads data and processing...
» more

Competitive advantages

CrateDB is typically used in operational analytics applications, particularly those...
» more

Typical application scenarios

CrateDB is ideal for integrating and analyzing streams of data--often machine-generated--in...
» more

Key customers

CrateDB customers include McAfee, Qualtrics , Nokia, NBC Golfnow , Digital Domain...
» more

Market metrics

The CrateDB open source project was started in 2014. CrateDB was the winner of TechCrunch...
» more

Licensing and pricing models

CrateDB pricing CrateDB Community Edition is open source and free to use under the...
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.