DBMS > CockroachDB vs. HyperSQL vs. MySQL

System Properties Comparison CockroachDB vs. HyperSQL vs. MySQL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

CockroachDB is a distributed database architected for modern cloud applications. It is wire compatible with PostgreSQL and backed by a Key-Value Store, which is either RocksDB or a purpose-built derivative, called Pebble.

Multithreaded, transactional RDBMS written in Java

also known as HSQLDB

Widely used open source RDBMS

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Key/Value like access via memcached API

Secondary database models

Document store
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	3.90
Rank	#68	Overall
	#36	Relational DBMS

Score	2.72
Rank	#90	Overall
	#49	Relational DBMS

Score	964.98
Rank	#2	Overall
	#2	Relational DBMS

Website

www.cockroachlabs.com

hsqldb.org

www.mysql.com

Technical documentation

www.cockroachlabs.com/docs

hsqldb.org/web/hsqlDocsFrame.html

dev.mysql.com/doc

Developer

Cockroach Labs

Oracle

since 2010, originally MySQL AB, then Sun

Initial release

2015

2001

1995

Current release

24.1.0, May 2024

2.7.2, June 2023

9.0.0, July 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0, commercial license available

Open Source

based on BSD license

Open Source

GPL version 2. Commercial licenses with extended functionallity are available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Windows

All OS with a Java VM

Embedded (into Java applications) and Client-Server operating modes

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

dynamic schema

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, wire compatible with PostgreSQL

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

JDBC

HTTP API

JDBC via HTTP
JDBC
ODBC

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

Supported programming languages

C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC
Java

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Java, SQL

yes

proprietary syntax

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning (by key range)

all tables are translated to an ordered KV store and then broken down into 64MB ranges, which are then used as replicas in RAFT

none

horizontal partitioning, sharding with MySQL Cluster or MySQL Fabric

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication using RAFT

none

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

not for MyISAM storage engine

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

not for MyISAM storage engine

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

table locks or row locks depending on storage engine

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role-based access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

MariaDB strengthens its position in the open source RDBMS market
5 April 2018, Matthias Gelbmann

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

IBM Expands Its Hybrid Cloud and AI Capabilities with CockroachDB Integration
7 May 2025, TipRanks

Cockroach Labs Brings Distributed SQL to IBM LinuxONE and Linux on IBM Z
7 May 2025, StreetInsider

Cockroach Labs Brings Distributed SQL to IBM LinuxONE and Linux on IBM Z
7 May 2025, Longview News-Journal

Cockroach Labs shakes up its licensing to force bigger companies to pay
15 August 2024, TechCrunch

AI Meets Resilience: Cockroach Labs Intros CockroachDB 24.2
2 October 2024, Channel Insider

provided by Google News

Java, JDBC and the HSQLDB database tutorial
14 November 2022, theserverside.com

HyperSQL DataBase flaw leaves library vulnerable to RCE
24 October 2022, PortSwigger

provided by Google News

MySQL at 30: Still important but no longer king
12 May 2025, InfoWorld

30 years of MySQL, the database that changed the world
6 May 2025, theregister.com

MySQL Explained: Your Guide to Mastering This Powerful Database
29 August 2024, Oracle

Migrate very large databases to Amazon Aurora MySQL using MyDumper and MyLoader
27 February 2025, Amazon Web Services

Build global MySQL apps using Cloudflare Workers and Hyperdrive
8 April 2025, The Cloudflare Blog

provided by Google News

Share this page