DBMS > ClickHouse vs. Sphinx vs. STSdb

System Properties Comparison ClickHouse vs. Sphinx vs. STSdb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high-performance, column-oriented SQL DBMS for online analytical processing (OLAP) that uses all available system resources to their full potential to process each analytical query as fast as possible. It is available as both an open-source software and a cloud offering.

Open source search engine for searching in data from different sources, e.g. relational databases

Key-Value Store with special method for indexing

optimized for high performance using a special indexing method

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Search engine

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	18.73
Rank	#31	Overall
	#19	Relational DBMS

Score	5.79
Rank	#56	Overall
	#5	Search engines

Score	0.03
Rank	#361	Overall
	#55	Key-value stores

Website

clickhouse.com

sphinxsearch.com

github.com/STSSoft/STSdb4

Technical documentation

clickhouse.com/docs

sphinxsearch.com/docs

Developer

Clickhouse Inc.

Sphinx Technologies Inc.

STS Soft SC

Initial release

2016

2001

2011

Current release

v24.6.2.17-stable, July 2024

3.5.1, February 2023

4.0.8, September 2015

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

GPL version 2, commercial licence available

Open Source

GPLv2, commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

FreeBSD
Linux
NetBSD
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

primitive types and user defined types (classes)

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

full-text index on all search fields

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL (SQL/JSON + extensions)

SQL-like query language (SphinxQL)

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
HTTP REST
JDBC
MySQL wire protocol
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Proprietary protocol

Proprietary protocol

.NET Client API

Supported programming languages

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Rust
Scala

3rd party library

C++

unofficial client library
Java
Perl

unofficial client library
PHP
Python
Ruby

unofficial client library

C#
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

key based and custom

Sharding

Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Asynchronous and synchronous physical replication; geographically distributed replicas; support for object storages.

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

The original contents of fields are not stored in the Sphinx index.

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles. Column and row based policies. Quotas and resource limits. Pluggable authentication with LDAP and Kerberos. Password based, X.509 certificate, and SSH key authentication.

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

The DB-Engines ranking includes now search engines
4 February 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Wiz Research Uncovers Exposed DeepSeek Database Leaking Sensitive Information, Including Chat History
29 January 2025, wiz.io

DeepSeek Exposed Database Leaks Sensitive Data
30 January 2025, Infosecurity Magazine

A Beginner’s Guide to ClickHouse Database
13 September 2024, KDnuggets

ClickHouse Announces Strategic Collaboration Agreement with AWS to Advance Real-Time Data Analytics and Generative AI Innovation
10 December 2024, Business Wire

Quesma bridges Elasticsearch and SQL, promises faster, cheaper queries
4 April 2025, Blocks and Files

provided by Google News

Manticore is on search for new investment and partners
9 December 2024, Blocks and Files

Brainiacs Episode 13: Sphinx Formations, Fake News, and “The Mom Penalty”
23 February 2024, NYU

Switching From Sphinx to MkDocs Documentation – What Did I Gain and Lose
2 February 2024, Towards Data Science

Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
25 July 2022, HackerNoon

10 Years of Building the Security Intelligence Graph: A Tech Retrospective
28 April 2020, Recorded Future

provided by Google News

Share this page