DBMS > ClickHouse vs. Oracle Berkeley DB

System Properties Comparison ClickHouse vs. Oracle Berkeley DB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare ClickHouse and Oracle Berkeley DB with Redis, SQLite and RocksDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high-performance, column-oriented SQL DBMS for online analytical processing (OLAP) that uses all available system resources to their full potential to process each analytical query as fast as possible. It is available as both an open-source software and a cloud offering.

Widely used in-process key-value store

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

supports sorted and unsorted key sets
Native XML DBMS

in the Oracle Berkeley DB XML version

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	18.77
Rank	#31	Overall
	#19	Relational DBMS

Score	1.72
Rank	#131	Overall
	#21	Key-value stores
	#3	Native XML DBMS

Website

clickhouse.com

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/berkeleydb.html

Technical documentation

clickhouse.com/docs

docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_05/html/index.html

Developer

Clickhouse Inc.

Oracle

originally developed by Sleepycat, which was acquired by Oracle

Initial release

2016

1994

Current release

v24.6.2.17-stable, July 2024

18.1.40, May 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C, Java, C++ (depending on the Berkeley DB edition)

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

AIX
Android
FreeBSD
iOS
Linux
OS X
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

only with the Berkeley DB XML edition

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL (SQL/JSON + extensions)

yes

SQL interfaced based on SQLite is available

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
HTTP REST
JDBC
MySQL wire protocol
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Proprietary protocol

Supported programming languages

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Rust
Scala

3rd party library

.Net

Figaro is a .Net framework assembly that extends Berkeley DB XML into an embeddable database engine for .NET
others

Third-party libraries to manipulate Berkeley DB files are available for many languages
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party binding
Perl
Python
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

only for the SQL API

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

key based and custom

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Asynchronous and synchronous physical replication; geographically distributed replicas; support for object storages.

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles. Column and row based policies. Quotas and resource limits. Pluggable authentication with LDAP and Kerberos. Password based, X.509 certificate, and SSH key authentication.

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

DB-Engines shares Q1 2025 database industry rankings and top climbers: Snowflake and PostgreSQL trending
1 May 2025, DB-Engines

show all

Recent citations in the news

Securing Cloud Databases: Best Practices with ClickHouse and Wiz
18 March 2025, wiz.io

Snowflake Challenger ClickHouse Targets $6 Billion Valuation
9 May 2025, The Information

DeepSeek Exposed Database Leaks Sensitive Data
30 January 2025, Infosecurity Magazine

ClickHouse Acquires HyperDX to Accelerate the Future of Observability
13 March 2025, Business Wire

DeepSeek AI Database Exposed: Over 1 Million Log Lines, Secret Keys Leaked
30 January 2025, The Hacker News

provided by Google News

Database Trends Report: SQL Beats NoSQL, MySQL Most Popular
5 March 2019, ADTmag

Which Are the Top Local Databases for React Native
15 October 2019, appinventiv.com

Fig. 2. XML Methods for Various XML DBMS Types
29 October 2024, ResearchGate

Margo I. Seltzer
12 December 2024, Berkman Klein Center

How to Set Up Virtual Domains and Virtual Users in Postfix
20 May 2016, Linux.com

provided by Google News

Share this page