DBMS > ClickHouse vs. Microsoft SQL Server

System Properties Comparison ClickHouse vs. Microsoft SQL Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare ClickHouse and Microsoft SQL Server with PostgreSQL, Databricks and MongoDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high-performance, column-oriented SQL DBMS for online analytical processing (OLAP) that uses all available system resources to their full potential to process each analytical query as fast as possible. It is available as both an open-source software and a cloud offering.

Microsofts flagship relational DBMS

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	18.77
Rank	#31	Overall
	#19	Relational DBMS

Score	774.89
Rank	#3	Overall
	#3	Relational DBMS

Website

clickhouse.com

www.microsoft.com/en-us/sql-server

Technical documentation

clickhouse.com/docs

learn.microsoft.com/en-US/sql/sql-server

Developer

Clickhouse Inc.

Microsoft

Initial release

2016

1989

Current release

v24.6.2.17-stable, July 2024

SQL Server 2022, November 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

restricted free version is available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL (SQL/JSON + extensions)

yes

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
HTTP REST
JDBC
MySQL wire protocol
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Proprietary protocol

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)

Supported programming languages

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Rust
Scala

3rd party library

C#
C++
Delphi
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

key based and custom

tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Asynchronous and synchronous physical replication; geographically distributed replicas; support for object storages.

yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles. Column and row based policies. Quotas and resource limits. Pluggable authentication with LDAP and Kerberos. Password based, X.509 certificate, and SSH key authentication.

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

DB-Engines shares Q1 2025 database industry rankings and top climbers: Snowflake and PostgreSQL trending
1 May 2025, DB-Engines

show all

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

Microsoft SQL Server is the DBMS of the Year
4 January 2017, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Securing Cloud Databases: Best Practices with ClickHouse and Wiz
18 March 2025, wiz.io

Snowflake Challenger ClickHouse Targets $6 Billion Valuation
9 May 2025, The Information

A Beginner’s Guide to ClickHouse Database
13 September 2024, KDnuggets

DeepSeek Exposed Database Leaks Sensitive Data
30 January 2025, Infosecurity Magazine

ClickHouse Acquires HyperDX to Accelerate the Future of Observability
13 March 2025, Business Wire

provided by Google News

Announcing SQL Server 2025 (preview): The AI-ready enterprise database from ground to cloud
19 May 2025, Microsoft

Data infrastructure evolves with SQL Server 2025
20 May 2025, SiliconANGLE

Microsoft Build: SQL Server 2025 Is (Almost) Here
19 May 2025, Redmondmag.com

Build 2025: SQL Server 2025 Launches in Public Preview
19 May 2025, Petri IT Knowledgebase

Running SQL Server Stretch Failover Cluster Instance on Amazon EC2 | Amazon Web Services
16 May 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

provided by Google News

Share this page