DBMS > ClickHouse vs. Graph Engine vs. TinkerGraph

System Properties Comparison ClickHouse vs. Graph Engine vs. TinkerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high-performance, column-oriented SQL DBMS for online analytical processing (OLAP) that uses all available system resources to their full potential to process each analytical query as fast as possible. It is available as both an open-source software and a cloud offering.

A distributed in-memory data processing engine, underpinned by a strongly-typed RAM store and a general distributed computation engine

A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS
Key-value store

Graph DBMS

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	18.61
Rank	#31	Overall
	#19	Relational DBMS

Score	0.53
Rank	#240	Overall
	#21	Graph DBMS
	#34	Key-value stores

Score	0.07
Rank	#352	Overall
	#38	Graph DBMS

Website

clickhouse.com

www.graphengine.io

tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#tinkergraph-gremlin

Technical documentation

clickhouse.com/docs

www.graphengine.io/docs/manual

Developer

Clickhouse Inc.

Microsoft

Initial release

2016

2010

2009

Current release

v24.6.2.17-stable, July 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

MIT License

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

.NET and C

Java

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

.NET

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL (SQL/JSON + extensions)

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
HTTP REST
JDBC
MySQL wire protocol
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Proprietary protocol

RESTful HTTP API

TinkerPop 3

Supported programming languages

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Rust
Scala

3rd party library

C#
C++
F#
Visual Basic

Groovy
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

key based and custom

horizontal partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Asynchronous and synchronous physical replication; geographically distributed replicas; support for object storages.

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

optional: either by committing a write-ahead log (WAL) to the local persistent storage or by dumping the memory to a persistent storage

optional

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles. Column and row based policies. Quotas and resource limits. Pluggable authentication with LDAP and Kerberos. Password based, X.509 certificate, and SSH key authentication.

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Securing Cloud Databases: Best Practices with ClickHouse and Wiz
18 March 2025, Wiz

ClickHouse Acquires HyperDX to Accelerate the Future of Observability
13 March 2025, Business Wire

A Beginner’s Guide to ClickHouse Database
13 September 2024, KDnuggets

DeepSeek Exposed Database Leaks Sensitive Data
30 January 2025, Infosecurity Magazine

Wiz reveals DeepSeek database exposed API keys, chat history
30 January 2025, TechTarget

provided by Google News

Trinity
30 October 2010, Microsoft

The graph analytics landscape 2019
27 February 2019, Data Science Central

IBM releases Graph, a service that can outperform SQL databases
27 July 2016, GeekWire

thatDot launches Quine, a streaming graph engine
23 February 2022, TechCrunch

Hey, corporate types. Microsoft would really love to pick your brains about Project Cortex
5 November 2019, The Register

provided by Google News

Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune
3 June 2024, AWS Blog

Automated testing of Amazon Neptune data access with Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
28 September 2022, AWS Blog

Figure 6: Performance of Dijkstra's algorithm in Property Graph...
7 February 2018, ResearchGate

Exploring new features of Apache TinkerPop 3.7.x in Amazon Neptune
7 June 2024, AWS Blog

provided by Google News

Share this page