DBMS > Brytlyt vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison Brytlyt vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Brytlyt and OrigoDB with MySQL, RocksDB and Informix.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Scalable GPU-accelerated RDBMS for very fast analytic and streaming workloads, leveraging PostgreSQL

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.43
Rank	#288	Overall
	#131	Relational DBMS

Score	0.19
Rank	#343	Overall
	#49	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Website

www.brytlyt.com

origodb.com

Technical documentation

origodb.com/docs

Developer

Brytlyt

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2016

2009

under the name LiveDB

Current release

0.9, October 2016

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++ and CUDA

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

specific XML-type available, but no XML query functionality.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Java
Perl
Python
Tcl

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

in PL/pgSQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

GPU Database Market is set to experience a significant growth rate ...
20 March 2023, Digital Journal

Brytlyt becomes NVIDIA Inception Premier Partner
31 January 2023, PR Newswire

Brytlyt Wins the TIBCO ISV Partner of the Year Award for ...
23 September 2022, PR Newswire

Brytlyt's Serverless Analytics Saves Businesses 90% of GPU Cost
1 December 2022, Datanami

Brytlyt secures $5m for GPU-powered analytics database
22 December 2021, UKTN (UK Technology News

provided by Google News

SuperSocket: Making Socket Programming in .NET Simpler
8 October 2014, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

Share this page