DBMS > Brytlyt vs. IRONdb vs. RethinkDB

System Properties Comparison Brytlyt vs. IRONdb vs. RethinkDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Scalable GPU-accelerated RDBMS for very fast analytic and streaming workloads, leveraging PostgreSQL

A distributed Time Series DBMS with a focus on scalability, fault tolerance and operational simplicity

DBMS for the Web with a mechanism to push updated query results to applications in realtime.

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Document store

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.52
Rank	#264	Overall
	#120	Relational DBMS

Score	0.20
Rank	#334	Overall
	#28	Time Series DBMS

Score	3.58
Rank	#98	Overall
	#19	Document stores

Website

www.brytlyt.com

www.circonus.com/solutions/time-series-database

rethinkdb.com

Technical documentation

docs.circonus.com/irondb

rethinkdb.com/docs

Developer

Brytlyt

Circonus LLC.

The Linux Foundation

since July 2017

Initial release

2016

2017

2009

Current release

0.9, October 2016

V0.10.20, January 2018

2.4.1, August 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++ and CUDA

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

text, numeric, histograms

yes

string, binary, float, bool, date, geometry

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

specific XML-type available, but no XML query functionality.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language (Circonus Analytics Query Language: CAQL)

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

HTTP API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Java
Perl
Python
Tcl

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala

community-supported driver
C#

community-supported driver
C++

community-supported driver
Clojure

community-supported driver
Dart

community-supported driver
Erlang

community-supported driver
Go

community-supported driver
Haskell

community-supported driver
Java

official driver
JavaScript (Node.js)

official driver
Lisp

community-supported driver
Lua

community-supported driver
Objective-C

community-supported driver
Perl

community-supported driver
PHP

community-supported driver
Python

official driver
Ruby

official driver
Scala

community-supported driver

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

in PL/pgSQL

yes, in Lua

Triggers

yes

Client-side triggers through changefeeds

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Automatic, metric affinity per node

Sharding

range based

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

configurable replication factor, datacenter aware

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate consistency per node, eventual consistency across nodes

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Atomic single-document operations

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

MVCC based

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

yes

users and table-level permissions

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Meet some database management systems you are likely to hear more about in the future
4 August 2014, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Brytlyt Wins the TIBCO ISV Partner of the Year Award for ...
23 September 2022, PR Newswire

Brytlyt's Serverless Analytics Saves Businesses 90% of GPU Cost
1 December 2022, Datanami

Global GPU Database Market Size 2023 Latest Report by ...
18 January 2023, Digital Journal

Brytlyt secures $5m for GPU-powered analytics database
22 December 2021, UKTN (UK Technology News

The insideBIGDATA IMPACT 50 List for Q1 2023
17 January 2023, insideBIGDATA

provided by Google News

Circonus Simplifies Monitoring & Observability for Large Enterprises
11 May 2022, PR Newswire

On the Radar: COVID-19, Circonus, and Fake FB Accounts
4 March 2020, Datanami

provided by Google News

NoSQL Databases Software Market Demonstrates A Spectacular Growth By 2029 | Amazon, MarkLogic, RethinkDB
27 January 2023, openPR

Enterprise-level Real-time Database System Market 2023 to 2029: Potential Growth, Share, Demand And Analysis O
25 January 2023, openPR

How to Use RethinkDB with Node.js Applications — SitePoint
16 December 2015, SitePoint

Build real-time Web apps with RethinkDB
1 September 2015, InfoWorld

Stripe acquires team behind NoSQL database startup RethinkDB
5 October 2016, VentureBeat

provided by Google News

Share this page