DBMS > BoltDB vs. SwayDB

System Properties Comparison BoltDB vs. SwayDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare BoltDB and SwayDB with RocksDB, TiDB and SQLite.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An embedded key-value store for Go.

An embeddable, non-blocking, type-safe key-value store for single or multiple disks and in-memory storage

Primary database model

Key-value store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.53
Rank	#229	Overall
	#35	Key-value stores

Score	0.08
Rank	#307	Overall
	#47	Key-value stores

Website

github.com/boltdb/bolt

swaydb.io

Developer

Simer Plaha

Initial release

2013

2018

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

Open Source

GNU Affero GPL V3.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Scala

Server operating systems

BSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

SQL

Support of SQL

Supported programming languages

Java
Kotlin
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

Atomic execution of operations

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Booming Growth in Key Value Database Market Analysis Report 2021 and Forecast to 2027 with different segments, Key players are Amazon Web Services (AWS),ArangoDB,BoltDB,Microsoft,DataStax,Memcached,Oracle,InterSystems,Pivotal Software – SoccerNurds
15 April 2021, SoccerNurds

Global Key Value Database Market 2021-2025: The Apache Software Foundation, Memcached, Redis Labs, Couchbase, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Aerospike, Microsoft, ArangoDB, DataStax, BoltDB, Software AG, FairCom Corporation, Cloudera, Oracle, GigaSpaces Technologies, Pivotal Software, Google
15 April 2021, SoccerNurds

Key-Value Stores Market SWOT Analysis, Outlook, By Top Key Players: Redis, Azure Redis Cache, ArangoDB, Hbase, Google Cloud Datastore etc.
16 April 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Global Key-Value Stores Market 2021: Redis, Azure Redis Cache, ArangoDB, Hbase, Google Cloud Datastore, Aerospike, BoltDB, Couchbase, Memcached, Oracle, DataStax, Infinispan etc
15 April 2021, Jumbo News

Global Key-Value Stores Market Financial reports of key industry players including CAGR value and SWOT Analysis Forecast 2021-2027 – Jumbo News
5 April 2021, Jumbo News

provided by Google News

FCA set to recognise new CISI pension transfer qualification
13 June 2017, Citywire.co.uk

provided by Google News

Share this page