DBMS > Blazegraph vs. Yaacomo
System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. Yaacomo
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Blazegraph Xexclude from comparison||Yaacomo Xexclude from comparison|
|Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.|
|Description||High-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.||OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing|
|Primary database model||Graph DBMS|
|Current release||2.1.4, August 2016|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source extended commercial license available||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes RDF literal types||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||SPARQL is used as query language||yes|
|APIs and other access methods||Java API|
RESTful HTTP API
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||horizontal partitioning|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||Master-slave replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes Relationships in Graphs||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes|
|User concepts Access control||Security and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard|
|More information provided by the system vendor|
Blazegraph 2.1.4 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.2 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.1 Release!
Blazegraph 2.1.0 Release!
Blazegraph 2.0.0 Release!
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
GPU Database Market Analysis by Leading Key Insights – Blazegraph, BlazingDB, Brytlyt, Fuzzy Logix, Jedox, Kinetica DB, Neo4j, OmniSci, SQream Technologies, ZILLIZ
GPU Database Market 2019 explosive growth with technical aspects by major players BlazingDB, Anaconda, OmniSci, Blazegraph, Fuzzy Logix, NVIDIA, Zilliz, Brytlyt, HeteroDB, SQream
Graph Database Market Assessment Reveals Profitable Opportunities throughout the Forecast Amount 2019- 2025
GPU Database Market Estimated to Rising at a Lucrative CAGR of +20% between 2019 and 2028 with Leading Vendors: Kinetica, OmniSci, SQream, Neo4j, NVIDIA, Brytlyt, Blazegraph, BlazingDB
provided by Google News
ANALYST, IT, SR
Semantic Java Developer - Scientific Computing
Share this page