DBMS > Blazegraph vs. TerarkDB
System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. TerarkDB
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
Our visitors often compare Blazegraph and TerarkDB with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL and Kinetica.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Blazegraph Xexclude from comparison||TerarkDB Xexclude from comparison|
|Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.|
|Description||High-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.||A key-value store forked from RocksDB with advanced compression algorithms. It can be used standalone or as a storage engine for MySQL and MongoDB|
|Primary database model||Graph DBMS|
|Current release||2.1.5, March 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source extended commercial license available||commercial restricted open source version available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes RDF literal types||no|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||SPARQL is used as query language||no|
|APIs and other access methods||Java API|
RESTful HTTP API
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||none|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||none|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes Relationships in Graphs||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes|
|User concepts Access control||Security and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)||no|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
GPU Database Market 2023 Growth Drivers and Future Outlook ...
Graph Database Market Upcoming Trends, Segmented by Type ...
GPU Database Market Players: Merges and Acquisition Strategies ...
Blazegraph Partners with Cirrascale Cloud Solutions for GPU ...
Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query ...
provided by Google News
Understand NVMe 2.0 specification and its related features
Terark, A Chinese Startup, May Have Just Revolutionized How Data Is Stored, Accessed & Analyzed
provided by Google News
Share this page