DBMS > Blazegraph vs. RDF4J vs. Virtuoso

System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. RDF4J vs. Virtuoso

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.

Description

High-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.

RDF4J is a Java framework for processing RDF data, supporting both memory-based and a disk-based storage.

Virtuoso is a multi-model hybrid-RDBMS that supports management of data represented as relational tables and/or property graphs

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
RDF store

RDF store

Document store
Graph DBMS
Native XML DBMS
Relational DBMS
RDF store
Spatial DBMS
Search engine

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.83
Rank	#186	Overall
	#16	Graph DBMS
	#8	RDF stores

Score	0.50
Rank	#232	Overall
	#9	RDF stores

Score	2.88
Rank	#99	Overall
	#19	Document stores
	#5	Graph DBMS
	#3	Native XML DBMS
	#50	Relational DBMS
	#3	RDF stores
	#2	Spatial DBMS
	#9	Search engines

Website

blazegraph.com

rdf4j.org

virtuoso.openlinksw.com

Technical documentation

wiki.blazegraph.com

rdf4j.org/documentation

docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso

Developer

Blazegraph

Since 2016 officially forked into an Eclipse project, former developer was Aduna Software.

OpenLink Software

Initial release

2006

2004

1998

Current release

2.1.5, March 2019

08.03.3316, March 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

extended commercial license available

Open Source

Eclipse Distribution License (EDL), v1.0.

Open Source

GPLv2, extended commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
OS X
Unix
Windows

AIX
FreeBSD
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

RDF Schemas

yes

SQL - Standard relational schema
RDF - Quad (S, P, O, G) or Triple (S, P, O)
XML - DTD, XML Schema
DAV - freeform filesystem objects, plus User Defined Types a/k/a Dynamic Extension Type

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

RDF literal types

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SPARQL is used as query language

yes

SQL-92, SQL-200x, SQL-3, SQLX

APIs and other access methods

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL QUERY
SPARQL UPDATE
TinkerPop 3

Java API
RIO

RDF Input/Output
Sail API
SeRQL

Sesame RDF Query Language
Sesame REST HTTP Protocol
SPARQL

ADO.NET
GeoSPARQL
HTTP API
JDBC
Jena RDF API
ODBC
OLE DB
RDF4J API
RESTful HTTP API
Sesame REST HTTP Protocol
SOAP webservices
SPARQL 1.1
WebDAV
XPath
XQuery
XSLT

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Java
JavaScript
PHP
Python
Ruby

Java
PHP
Python

.Net
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Virtuoso PL

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

yes

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

Chain, star, and bi-directional replication
Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in Graphs

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Isolation support depends on the API used

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

in-memory storage is supported as well

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Security and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)

Fine-grained Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) in addition to typical coarse-grained Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) according to SQL-standard. Pluggable authentication with supported standards (LDAP, Active Directory, Kerberos)

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Virtuoso is a modern multi-model RDBMS for managing data represented as tabular relations...
» more

Competitive advantages

Performance & Scale — as exemplified by DBpedia and the LOD Cloud it spawned, i.e.,...
» more

Typical application scenarios

Used for — Analytics/BI Conceptual Data Virtualization Enterprise Knowledge Graphs...
» more

Key customers

Broad use across enterprises and governments including — European Union (EU) US Government...
» more

Market metrics

Largest installed-base of Multi-Model RDBMS for AI-friendly Knowledge Graphs Platform...
» more

Licensing and pricing models

Available in both Commercial Enterprise and Open Source (GPL v2) Editions Feature...
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Global GPU Database Market 2025: Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia, Brytlyt, Jedox, Blazegraph, Blazingdb, Zilliz, Heterodb, H2o.Ai, Fastdata.Io, Fuzzy Logix, Graphistry, Anaconda – NeighborWebSJ
8 March 2021, NeighborWebSJ

GPU Database Market Size 2021, Global Growth Rate by Manufacturers – Graphistry, BlazingDB, Kinetica, SQream, Zilliz, OmniSci, Brytlyt, NVIDIA, Blazegraph, Jedox, Neo4j, HeteroDB, Fuzzy Logix, Anaconda – The Bisouv Network
5 March 2021, The Bisouv Network

GPU Database Market Research Report 2027 : Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia, Brytlyt, Jedox, Blazegraph, Blazingdb, Zilliz, Heterodb, H2o.Ai, Fastdata.Io, Fuzzy Logix, Graphistry, Anaconda
4 March 2021, The Bisouv Network

GPU Database Market Growth Status After COVID19, Major Competitors – Fuzzy Logix, BlazingDB, SQream, HeteroDB, Graphistry, Brytlyt, Anaconda, Jedox, Neo4j, Kinetica, Blazegraph, OmniSci, Zilliz, NVIDIA – The Bisouv Network
4 March 2021, The Bisouv Network

Comprehensive Report on GPU Database Market 2021 | Trends, Growth Demand, Opportunities & Forecast To 2027 |Neo4j, Brytlyt, Blazegraph, HeteroDB, Graphistry – NeighborWebSJ
3 March 2021, NeighborWebSJ

provided by Google News

GraphDB 9.5 Offers Data Virtualization From Tables to Graphs and Back
9 December 2020, PRNewswire

Big data database Apache Rya becomes a Top Level Project
10 October 2019, JAXenter

Ontotext's GraphDB 8.9 Boosts Semantic Similarity Search
10 April 2019, PR Newswire UK

GraphDB Goes Open Source
27 January 2020, iProgrammer

Amazon Neptune review: A scalable graph database for OLTP
13 May 2019, InfoWorld

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Graph Database Technical Architect
Capgemini, Chicago, IL

Data Engineer II - Scientific Computing
Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Senior Dev Ops Engineer – Fully Remote
Genosity, Iselin, NJ

Senior DevOps Engineer (FT)
Genosity, Inc, Iselin, NJ

jobs by

Share this page