DBMS > Blazegraph vs. OpenEdge
System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. OpenEdge
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Blazegraph Xexclude from comparison||OpenEdge Xexclude from comparison|
|Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.|
|Description||High-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.||Application development environment with integrated database management system|
|Primary database model||Graph DBMS|
|Developer||Blazegraph||Progress Software Corporation|
|Current release||2.1.4, August 2016||OpenEdge 11.7, March 2017|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source extended commercial license available||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes RDF literal types||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||SPARQL is used as query language||yes close to SQL 92|
|APIs and other access methods||Java API|
RESTful HTTP API
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||horizontal partitioning since Version 11.4|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||Master-slave replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes Relationships in Graphs||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no|
|User concepts Access control||Security and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)||Users and groups|
|More information provided by the system vendor|
Blazegraph 2.1.4 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.2 Release
Blazegraph 2.1.1 Release!
Blazegraph 2.1.0 Release!
Blazegraph 2.0.0 Release!
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
GPU Database Market Dynamic Outlook and Influencing Key Growth Drivers By Blazegraph, BlazingDB, Brytlyt, Fuzzy Logix, Jedox, Kinetica DB, Neo4j, OmniSci, SQream Technologies
GPU Database Market PEST Analysis by 2027 with Top Companies – Blazegraph, BlazingDB, Brytlyt, Fuzzy Logix, Jedox, Kinetica DB, Neo4j, OmniSci, SQream Technologies, ZILLIZ
Worldwide Graph Database Market Size Study for 2019 to 2025 providing informatio
Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language?
provided by Google News
SQL vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL: Finding the Right Solution
Healthcare IT Market Size 2019 Global Industry Share, Growth, Trend, Opportunities and Forecast to 2026
provided by Google News
Semantic Back End Developer - Scientific Computing
ANALYST, IT, SR
Progress/Java - Software Engineer
QAD Progress Programmer/Analyst & Database Administrator
Senior Software Engineer - Progress
Share this page