DB-EnginesExtremeDB: the mission critical dbmsEnglish
Deutsch
Knowledge Base of Relational and NoSQL Database Management Systemsprovided by solid IT

DBMS > Blazegraph vs. Hypertable vs. Tarantool vs. TerarkDB

System Properties Comparison Blazegraph vs. Hypertable vs. Tarantool vs. TerarkDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
NameBlazegraph  Xexclude from comparisonHypertable  Xexclude from comparisonTarantool  Xexclude from comparisonTerarkDB  Xexclude from comparison
Amazon has acquired Blazegraph's domain and (probably) product. It is said that Amazon Neptune is based on Blazegraph.Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
DescriptionHigh-performance graph database supporting Semantic Web (RDF/SPARQL) and Graph Database (tinkerpop3, blueprints, vertex-centric) APIs with scale-out and High Availability.An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as HadoopIn-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applicationsA key-value store forked from RocksDB with advanced compression algorithms. It can be used standalone or as a storage engine for MySQL and MongoDB
Primary database modelGraph DBMS
RDF store
Wide column storeKey-value storeKey-value store
Secondary database modelsDocument store
Relational DBMS
Spatial DBMS infowith Tarantool/GIS extension
DB-Engines Ranking infomeasures the popularity of database management systemsranking trend
Trend Chart
Score1.14
Rank#187  Overall
#17  Graph DBMS
#8  RDF stores
Score1.77
Rank#146  Overall
#27  Key-value stores
Score0.15
Rank#345  Overall
#50  Key-value stores
Websiteblazegraph.comwww.tarantool.iogithub.com/­Terark/­terarkdb
Technical documentationwiki.blazegraph.comwww.tarantool.io/­en/­docgithub.com/­Terark/­terarkdb/­wiki
DeveloperBlazegraphHypertable Inc.VKTerark
Initial release2006200920082016
Current release2.1.5, March 20190.9.8.11, March 20162.10.0, May 2022
License infoCommercial or Open SourceOpen Source infoextended commercial license availableOpen Source infoGNU version 3. Commercial license availableOpen Source infoBSDcommercial inforestricted open source version available
Cloud-based only infoOnly available as a cloud servicenononono
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) infoDatabase as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation languageJavaC++C and C++C++
Server operating systemsLinux
OS X
Windows
Linux
OS X
Windows infoan inofficial Windows port is available
BSD
Linux
macOS
Data schemeschema-freeschema-freeschema-free, schema definition possibleschema-free
Typing infopredefined data types such as float or dateyes infoRDF literal typesnostring, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, booleanno
XML support infoSome form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.nono
Secondary indexesyesrestricted infoonly exact value or prefix value scansyesno
SQL infoSupport of SQLSPARQL is used as query languagenoFull-featured ANSI SQL supportno
APIs and other access methodsJava API
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL QUERY
SPARQL UPDATE
TinkerPop 3
C++ API
Thrift
Open binary protocolC++ API
Java API
Supported programming languages.Net
C
C++
Java
JavaScript
PHP
Python
Ruby
C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
C
C#
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Rust
C++
Java
Server-side scripts infoStored proceduresyesnoLua, C and SQL stored proceduresno
Triggersnonoyesno
Partitioning methods infoMethods for storing different data on different nodesShardingShardingHash sharding based on virtual bucketsnone
Replication methods infoMethods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodesyesselectable replication factor on file system levelMulti-source replication
Source-replica replication
none
MapReduce infoOffers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methodsnoyesno
Consistency concepts infoMethods to ensure consistency in a distributed systemImmediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configurationImmediate ConsistencyImmediate Consistency
Foreign keys infoReferential integrityyes infoRelationships in Graphsnoyes, with SQLno
Transaction concepts infoSupport to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of dataACIDnoACID, read commitedno
Concurrency infoSupport for concurrent manipulation of datayesyesyes, cooperative multitaskingyes
Durability infoSupport for making data persistentyesyesyes, regular snapshots on disk, write ahead loggingyes
In-memory capabilities infoIs there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistenceyes
User concepts infoAccess controlSecurity and Authentication via Web Application Container (Tomcat, Jetty)noAccess rights for users and rolesno

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources
BlazegraphHypertableTarantoolTerarkDB
DB-Engines blog posts

Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication
9 November 2021,  Vladimir Perepelytsya, Tarantool (sponsor) 

show all

Recent citations in the news

Graph Database Market Growth Opportunity 2022 | Key Dynamics, Latest Trends, CAGR Status, Industry Revenue, Leading Players with Industry Segments Forecast to 2025
14 November 2022, Digital Journal

Graph Database Market Insights, Top Trends, Key Drivers, Growth Analysis and Forecast To 2032 | IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j
11 November 2022, Digital Journal

GPU Database Market Size In 2022 : Increasing Consumption SWOT Analysis, Latest Innovation, Recent Industry Developments, Top Leading Players with Top Countries Data
15 November 2022, Digital Journal

Graph Database Market Survey Report 2022 Along with Statistics, Forecasts till 2028 | Top Players are Oracle,
22 November 2022, openPR

With 22.5% CAGR, Graph Database Market Size Estimated to Reach $5.1 billion by 2026
20 July 2022, Digital Journal

provided by Google News

Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with Amazon S3
29 November 2022, thenewstack.io

TimescaleDB goes distributed; implements ‘Chunking’ over ‘Sharding’ for scaling-out
22 August 2019, Packt Hub

NoSQL Market: Global Industry Outlook, Size (US$ 27.4 Billion), Share, Growth (CAGR of 30.2%), Top Companies A
24 November 2022, openPR

provided by Google News

Tarantool: A Lua-based database engine
13 April 2016, Opensource.com

provided by Google News

Understand NVMe 2.0 specification and its related features
4 January 2022, TechTarget

A Chinese company is making the cloud 200x faster · TechNode
3 July 2017, TechNode

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Technical Support Engineer
Wallarm, Remote

Technical Support Engineer (Remote)
Wallarm, Remote

Senior Python Developer
Wallarm, Remote

Middle / Senior Ruby Developer
Wallarm, Remote

jobs by Indeed



Share this page

Featured Products

Redis logo

The world’s most loved real‑time data platform.
Try free

MariaDB logo

SkySQL, the ultimate
MariaDB cloud, is here.

Get started with SkySQL today!

AllegroGraph logo

Graph Database Leader for AI Knowledge Graph Applications - The Most Secure Graph Database Available.
Free Download

The definitive guide for Cassandra

Imagine What You Could Do if Scalability Wasn‘t a Problem!
Download the Cassandra e-book for free!

Neo4j logo

See for yourself how a graph database can make your life easier.
Use Neo4j online for free.

Present your product here