DBMS > BigObject vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison BigObject vs. XTDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare BigObject and XTDB with Microsoft Azure SQL Database, Immudb and Amazon DynamoDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.14
Rank	#333	Overall
	#145	Relational DBMS

Score	0.20
Rank	#314	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

bigobject.io

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

docs.bigobject.io

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

BigObject, Inc.

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2015

2019

Current release

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free community edition available

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Clojure

Server operating systems

Linux

distributed as a docker-image
OS X

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)
Windows

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

fluentd
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Lua

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

automatically between fact table and dimension tables

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

Share this page