DBMS > BigObject vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison BigObject vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare BigObject and OrigoDB with MySQL, TimescaleDB and MongoDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.20
Rank	#331	Overall
	#144	Relational DBMS

Score	0.20
Rank	#334	Overall
	#46	Document stores
	#19	Object oriented DBMS

Website

bigobject.io

origodb.com

Technical documentation

docs.bigobject.io

origodb.com/docs

Developer

BigObject, Inc.

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2015

2009

under the name LiveDB

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free community edition available

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux

distributed as a docker-image
OS X

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)
Windows

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

APIs and other access methods

fluentd
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Lua

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

automatically between fact table and dimension tables

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

How to Stay Sane With Modern C++
7 February 2017, dzone.com

provided by Google News

SuperSocket: Making Socket Programming in .NET Simpler
8 October 2014, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

Share this page