DBMS > BigObject vs. Google Cloud Datastore vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison BigObject vs. Google Cloud Datastore vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries

Automatically scaling NoSQL Database as a Service (DBaaS) on the Google Cloud Platform

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed

Document store

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.13
Rank	#342	Overall
	#150	Relational DBMS

Score	4.49
Rank	#79	Overall
	#12	Document stores

Score	47.84
Rank	#21	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

bigobject.io

cloud.google.com/datastore

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

docs.bigobject.io

cloud.google.com/datastore/docs

docs.teradata.com

Developer

BigObject, Inc.

Google

Teradata

Initial release

2015

2008

1984

Current release

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free community edition available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Server operating systems

Linux

distributed as a docker-image
OS X

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)
Windows

distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)

hosted

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

yes, details here

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

SQL-like query language (GQL)

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

fluentd
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

gRPC (using protocol buffers) API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

.Net
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Lua

using Google App Engine

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

Callbacks using the Google Apps Engine

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

Multi-source replication using Paxos

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

using Google Cloud Dataflow

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on type of query and configuration

Strong Consistency is default for entity lookups and queries within an Entity Group (but can instead be made eventually consistent). Other queries are always eventual consistent.

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

automatically between fact table and dimension tables

yes

via ReferenceProperties or Ancestor paths

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Serializable Isolation within Transactions, Read Committed outside of Transactions

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users, groups and roles based on Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM)

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Google Cloud is NOT magicking away data egress fees
12 January 2024, The Stack

SAP adds vector datastore to HANA Cloud database
2 November 2023, Techzine Europe

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service datastore support for Google Cloud VMware Engine
7 February 2023, netapp.com

Your Memories. Their Cloud.
1 January 2023, The New York Times

All of Google’s cloud database services are now out of beta
16 August 2016, TechCrunch

provided by Google News

The Analyst Verdict: Teradata In The Eyes Of 8 Experts - Teradata (NYSE:TDC)
15 April 2024, Benzinga

Teradata's (TDC) Anaconda Partnership to Aid Portfolio Strength
11 April 2024, Yahoo Finance

Anaconda and Teradata partner to enhance open-source support for AI innovation
12 April 2024, CloudTech News

The past five years for Teradata (NYSE:TDC) investors has not been profitable
11 April 2024, Simply Wall St

Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC Has $21.71 Million Holdings in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
14 April 2024, Defense World

provided by Google News

Share this page