DBMS > Badger vs. EJDB vs. Microsoft SQL Server
System Properties Comparison Badger vs. EJDB vs. Microsoft SQL Server
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Badger Xexclude from comparison||EJDB Xexclude from comparison||Microsoft SQL Server Xexclude from comparison|
|Description||An embeddable, persistent, simple and fast Key-Value Store, written purely in Go.||Embeddable document-store database library with JSON representation of queries (in MongoDB style)||Microsofts flagship relational DBMS|
|Primary database model||Key-value store||Document store||Relational DBMS|
|Secondary database models||Document store|
|Current release||SQL Server 2019, November 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source Apache 2.0||Open Source GPLv2||commercial restricted free version is available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||BSD|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||no||yes string, integer, double, bool, date, object_id||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||yes|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||no||yes|
|APIs and other access methods||in-process shared library||ADO.NET|
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)
|Supported programming languages||Go||Actionscript|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||no||Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||none||none||tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||none||none||yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||none||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||no typically not needed, however similar functionality with collection joins possible||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||no||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes Read/Write Locking||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no||yes|
|User concepts Access control||no||no||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
|Related products and services|
|3rd parties||Navicat for SQL Server gives you a fully graphical approach to database management and development.|
Navicat Monitor is a safe, simple and agentless remote server monitoring tool for SQL Server and many other database management systems.
SQL Complete: An advanced IntelliSense-style code completion add-in for SSMS and Visual Studio. Write, beautify, refactor your SQL code and give your productivity a dramatic boost.
SQLFlow: Provides a visual representation of the overall flow of data. Automated SQL data lineage analysis across Databases, ETL, Business Intelligence, Cloud and Hadoop environments by parsing SQL Script and stored procedure.
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Badger||EJDB||Microsoft SQL Server|
|DB-Engines blog posts|