DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Titan vs. Yaacomo
System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Titan vs. Yaacomo
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
|Atos Standard Common Repository Xexclude from comparison
|Titan Xexclude from comparison
|Yaacomo Xexclude from comparison
|This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
|Titan has been decommisioned after the takeover by Datastax. It will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking. A fork has been open-sourced as JanusGraph.
|Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking
|Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks
|Titan is a Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters.
|OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing
|Primary database model
|Atos Convergence Creators
|Aurelius, owned by DataStax
|License Commercial or Open Source
|Open Source Apache license, version 2.0
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems
|Schema and schema-less with LDAP views
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.
|SQL Support of SQL
|APIs and other access methods
|Supported programming languages
|All languages with LDAP bindings
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes
|Sharding cell division
|yes via pluggable storage backends
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods
|yes via Faunus, a graph analytics engine
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system
|Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration
|Foreign keys Referential integrity
|yes Relationships in graph
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data
|Atomic execution of specific operations
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data
|Durability Support for making data persistent
|yes Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.
|User concepts Access control
|LDAP bind authentication
|User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server
|fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Atos Standard Common Repository
|DB-Engines blog posts
Graph DBMS increased their popularity by 500% within the last 2 years Graph DBMSs are gaining in popularity faster than any other database category
Graph DBMSs are gaining in popularity faster than any other database category
|Recent citations in the news
JanusGraph Picks Up Where TitanDB Left Off
Amazon DynamoDB Storage Backend for Titan: Distributed Graph Database | Amazon Web Services
Titan Graph Database Integration with DynamoDB: World-class Performance, Availability, and Scale for New Workloads
DSE Graph review: Graph database does double duty
5 Q's with Graph Database Expert Marko Rodriguez – Center for Data Innovation
provided by Google News
Share this page