DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. TimescaleDB vs. VoltDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. TimescaleDB vs. VoltDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

A time series DBMS optimized for fast ingest and complex queries, based on PostgreSQL

Distributed In-Memory NewSQL RDBMS

Used for OLTP applications with a high frequency of relatively simple transactions, that can hold all their data in memory

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	5.38
Rank	#77	Overall
	#4	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.90
Rank	#153	Overall
	#72	Relational DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.timescale.com

www.voltdb.com

Technical documentation

docs.timescale.com

docs.voltdb.com

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Timescale

VoltDB Inc.

Initial release

2016

2017

2010

Current release

1703

2.11.0, May 2023

11.3, April 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

AGPL for Community Edition, commercial license for Enterprise, AWS, and Pro Editions

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Java, C++

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
OS X

for development

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

numerics, strings, booleans, arrays, JSON blobs, geospatial dimensions, currencies, binary data, other complex data types

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

full PostgreSQL SQL syntax

yes

only a subset of SQL 99

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

Java API
JDBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Java

JDBC
JavaScript
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C#
C++
Erlang

not officially supported
Go
Java
JavaScript

Node.js
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions, PL/pgSQL, PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Java, PL/PHP, PL/R, PL/Ruby, PL/Scheme, PL/Unix shell

Java

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

yes, across time and space (hash partitioning) attributes

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication with hot standby and reads on replicas

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

FOREIGN KEY constraints are not supported

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Transactions are executed single-threaded within stored procedures

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Data access is serialized by the server

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Snapshots and command logging

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users and roles with access to stored procedures

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

TimescaleDB Is a Vector Database Now, Too
25 September 2023, Datanami

InfluxDB Clustered targets on-premises time-series database deployments
6 September 2023, InfoWorld

Introduction to Databases in Data Science
8 September 2023, KDnuggets

Visualizing IoT Data at Scale With Hopara and TimescaleDB
16 May 2023, Embedded Computing Design

TimescaleDB setzt nun auch auf Vektordatenbanken | heise online
26 September 2023, heise online

provided by Google News

10 Lesser-Known Databases. Discover Hidden Gems | by Abnoan ...
29 September 2023, DataDrivenInvestor

RDBMS Software Market Size [2023-2030] | Rising Trends, Growing ...
29 September 2023, Digital Journal

Data Management System (DBMS) Market Size, Growth | Global Report, 2030
26 September 2023, Benzinga

Future of In-Memory Database Market by 2030 | Trends and Predictions
25 September 2023, Benzinga

VoltDB Launches Active(N) Lossless Cross Data Center Replication
31 August 2021, PR Newswire

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Rust Engineers (Multiple Openings) - Remote
Keyrock, Remote

Infrastructure Engineer
Messari, Remote

Mid or Senior Rust Backend Developer (Multiple openings - remote possible)
Keyrock, Remote

Data Engineer
Moxion Power, Richmond, CA

Data & Machine Learning Engineer
Hewlett-Packard CDS GmbH, Houston, TX

jobs by

Share this page