DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Access vs. Yaacomo
System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Access vs. Yaacomo
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Atos Standard Common Repository Xexclude from comparison||Microsoft Access Xexclude from comparison||Yaacomo Xexclude from comparison|
|This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.||Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking|
|Description||Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks||Microsoft Access combines a backend RDBMS (JET / ACE Engine) with a GUI frontend for data manipulation and queries. The Access frontend is often used for accessing other datasources (DBMS, Excel, etc.)||OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing|
|Primary database model||Document store|
|Relational DBMS||Relational DBMS|
|Developer||Atos Convergence Creators||Microsoft||Q2WEB GmbH|
|Current release||1703||1902 (16.0.11328.20222), March 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||commercial||commercial Bundled with Microsoft Office||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux||Windows Not a real database server, but making use of DLLs||Android|
|Data scheme||Schema and schema-less with LDAP views||yes||yes|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||optional||yes||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||yes||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||yes but not compliant to any SQL standard||yes|
|APIs and other access methods||LDAP||ADO.NET|
|Supported programming languages||All languages with LDAP bindings||C|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||yes since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine|
|Triggers||yes||yes since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding cell division||none||horizontal partitioning|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||none||Source-replica replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||yes||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||Atomic execution of specific operations||ACID but no files for transaction logging||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes but no files for transaction logging||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes||yes|
|User concepts Access control||LDAP bind authentication||no a simple user-level security was built in till version Access 2003||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Atos Standard Common Repository||Microsoft Access||Yaacomo|
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MS Access drops in DB-Engines Ranking Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
|Recent citations in the news|
Abusing Microsoft Access "Linked Table" Feature to Perform NTLM ...
Adherence to Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapy Lowers ...
NeurologyLive® Brain Games: November 26, 2023
Why Business Organizations Must Implement the Zero Trust Security ...
MS access program to increase awareness and independence of ...
provided by Google News
Staying power: the growing impact of PostgreSQL on enterprise ...
provided by Google News
Data Coordinator (Remote)
Business Reporting Analyst - Remote - Accountable Care - 1.0FTE Days
Personnel Security Technician I
Entry-Level IT Assistant
Share this page