DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Access vs. RDF4J

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Microsoft Access vs. RDF4J

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Microsoft Access combines a backend RDBMS (JET / ACE Engine) with a GUI frontend for data manipulation and queries.

The Access frontend is often used for accessing other datasources (DBMS, Excel, etc.)

RDF4J is a Java framework for processing RDF data, supporting both memory-based and a disk-based storage.

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

RDF store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	132.06
Rank	#10	Overall
	#7	Relational DBMS

Score	1.15
Rank	#203	Overall
	#8	RDF stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/access

rdf4j.org

Technical documentation

developer.microsoft.com/en-us/access

rdf4j.org/documentation

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Microsoft

Since 2016 officially forked into an Eclipse project, former developer was Aduna Software.

Initial release

2016

1992

2004

Current release

1703

1902 (16.0.11328.20222), March 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Bundled with Microsoft Office

Open Source

Eclipse Distribution License (EDL), v1.0.

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Windows

Not a real database server, but making use of DLLs

Linux
OS X
Unix
Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

RDF Schemas

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

but not compliant to any SQL standard

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

ADO.NET
DAO
ODBC
OLE DB

Java API
RIO

RDF Input/Output
Sail API
SeRQL

Sesame RDF Query Language
Sesame REST HTTP Protocol
SPARQL

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

C
C#
C++
Delphi
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
VBA
Visual Basic.NET

Java
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine

yes

Triggers

yes

since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

but no files for transaction logging

ACID

Isolation support depends on the API used

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

but no files for transaction logging

yes

in-memory storage is supported as well

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

a simple user-level security was built in till version Access 2003

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MS Access drops in DB-Engines Ranking
2 May 2013, Paul Andlinger

Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking
3 December 2012, Matthias Gelbmann

New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
3 October 2012, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

An Easy Guide on How to Use Microsoft Access Business Productivity Tool
15 March 2023, Simplilearn

Microsoft Access: Is it still relevant in 2023? - Explore Alternatives
9 January 2023, comparitech.com

Microsoft Access Tutorial: MS Access with Example [Easy Notes]
4 March 2023, Guru99

10 Best MS Access Training, Courses & Classes Online 2023
2 March 2023, codespaces.com

How to run a module in ms access from C++ - Microsoft Q&A
17 January 2023, learn.microsoft.com

provided by Google News

Ontotext's GraphDB 10 Brings Modern Data Architectures to the ...
5 July 2022, PR Newswire

GraphDB Goes Open Source
27 January 2020, iProgrammer

Janes Intara - Frequently Asked Questions
16 November 2022, Jane's

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Data Coordinator- Remote
Medline Industries Inc, Northfield, IL

MS Access Developer
NCIS, Concord, NC

MS Access Developer
First Merchants Bank, Daleville, IN

BD Representative 1
IQVIA, Remote

Human Resources Generalist DC
Sephora USA, Maryland

2023 PhD Graduate - Ontologist - QAI
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), Laurel, MD

Ontologist
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), Laurel, MD

jobs by

Share this page