DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JanusGraph vs. Tarantool

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JanusGraph vs. Tarantool

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

A Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters

It was forked from the latest code base of Titan in January 2017

In-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applications

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Graph DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Document store
Relational DBMS
Spatial DBMS

with Tarantool/GIS extension

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.79
Rank	#117	Overall
	#6	Graph DBMS

Score	1.87
Rank	#151	Overall
	#27	Key-value stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

janusgraph.org

www.tarantool.io

Technical documentation

docs.janusgraph.org

www.tarantool.io/en/doc

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Linux Foundation; originally developed as Titan by Aurelius

Initial release

2016

2017

2008

Current release

1703

0.6.1, January 2022

2.10.0, May 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

BSD

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X
Unix
Windows

BSD
Linux
macOS

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

schema-free, schema definition possible

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

string, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, boolean

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Full-featured ANSI SQL support

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

Java API
TinkerPop Blueprints
TinkerPop Frames
TinkerPop Gremlin
TinkerPop Rexster

Open binary protocol

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

Clojure
Java
Python

C
C#
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Lua, C and SQL stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

yes

depending on the used storage backend (e.g. Cassandra, HBase, BerkeleyDB)

Hash sharding based on virtual buckets

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via Faunus, a graph analytics engine

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

yes, with SQL

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

ACID, read commited

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, cooperative multitasking

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast

yes, regular snapshots on disk, write ahead logging

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistence

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication
9 November 2021, Vladimir Perepelytsya, Tarantool (sponsor)

show all

Recent citations in the news

LinkedIn's open-source Feathr feature store for machine learning ...
12 September 2022, SiliconANGLE News

Noetic Cyber emerges from stealth with security monitoring using a ...
28 July 2021, SiliconANGLE News

The untapped potential of HPC + graph computing
30 October 2021, VentureBeat

Neo4j Hits $2B-Plus Valuation After $325M Raise
17 June 2021, Crunchbase News

The year of the graph: Getting graphic, going native, reshaping the ...
8 January 2018, ZDNet

provided by Google News

Tarantool: A Lua-based database engine
13 April 2016, Opensource.com

Security Bulletin 20 Apr 2022
20 April 2022, Cyber Security Agency of Singapore

Integrating API Security and WAF into K8s Kong API Gateway
8 September 2022, Security Boulevard

Security Bulletin 14 Dec 2022
14 December 2022, Cyber Security Agency of Singapore

provided by Google News

Share this page