DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Interbase vs. Oracle NoSQL

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Interbase vs. Oracle NoSQL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Light-weight proven RDBMS

originally from Borland

A multi-model, scalable, distributed NoSQL database, designed to provide highly reliable, flexible, and available data management across a configurable set of storage nodes

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Document store
Key-value store
Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	5.98
Rank	#70	Overall
	#38	Relational DBMS

Score	3.97
Rank	#96	Overall
	#18	Document stores
	#16	Key-value stores
	#48	Relational DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.embarcadero.com/products/interbase

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/nosql.html

Technical documentation

docs.embarcadero.com/products/interbase

docs.oracle.com/en/database/other-databases/nosql-database/index.html

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Embarcadero

Oracle

Initial release

2016

1984

2011

Current release

1703

InterBase 2020, December 2019

22.3, December 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Proprietary for Enterprise Edition (Oracle Database EE license has Oracle NoSQL database EE covered: details)

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Android
iOS
Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
Solaris SPARC/x86

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

Support Fixed schema and Schema-less deployment with the ability to interoperate between them.

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

optional

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

export as XML data possible

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Java
Object Pascal
PHP
Ruby

C
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Interbase procedure and trigger language

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

none

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Interbase Change Views

Electable source-replica replication per shard. Support distributed global deployment with Multi-region table feature

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

with Hadoop integration

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

depending on configuration

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

configurable

ACID within a storage node (=shard)

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Multiversion concurreny control

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

off heap cache

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Top 10 Data Management Platforms and Software to Know in 2022
13 June 2022, Analytics Insight

An independent soccer league transforming lives in a slum in Kenya
15 November 2022, FanSided

AHQ (Unit) Islamabad wins interbase shooting c’ship
12 February 2020, Pakistan Observer

transcosmos increases workstations at Kuala Lumpur KLCC, its ...
26 October 2021, PR Web

Firebird 2.0 Beta Released – OSnews
18 November 2005, OS News

provided by Google News

Oracle NoSQL database comes to the cloud
2 April 2020, TechTarget

NoSQL Basics: Features, Types, and Examples
18 October 2022, Spiceworks News and Insights

8 Most Popular NoSQL Databases
25 November 2022, Analytics India Magazine

Oracle Beefs Up Its NoSQL Database Offering
3 April 2014, Data Center Knowledge

Oracle and Microsoft Rolling Out Database Service for Azure
25 July 2022, Datamation

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Delphi Developer
Softacom, Remote

Delphi Developer--Remote
iTech, Remote

Delphi Developer - Frederick, MD
Teamware Solutions (quantum leap consulting)., Remote

I.T. Development Manager # 999
Replacement Parts Inc., Little Rock, AR

Delphi Developer
Vizva Technologies, Frederick, MD

Workday Integration Consultant
Brahma Consulting Group, Remote

Oracle Database Engineer
PSRTEK, Remote

Mainframe Developer
Capgemini, Charlotte, NY

Mainframe Developer
Capgemini, Charlotte, NC

AWS Senior Developer(Backend) NO DevOps
Apptrics LLC, Remote

jobs by

Share this page