DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. ClickHouse vs. Tarantool

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. ClickHouse vs. Tarantool

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Column-oriented Relational DBMS powering Yandex

In-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applications

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS
Spatial DBMS

with Tarantool/GIS extension

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	13.18
Rank	#46	Overall
	#30	Relational DBMS

Score	1.53
Rank	#144	Overall
	#27	Key-value stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

clickhouse.tech

www.tarantool.io

Technical documentation

clickhouse.tech/docs

www.tarantool.io/en/doc

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Clickhouse Inc.

Initial release

2016

2008

Current release

1703

v22.6.3.35-stable, July 2022

2.4.2, July 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

BSD

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS

BSD
Linux
macOS

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

schema-free, schema definition possible

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

string, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, boolean

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to ANSI SQL

Full-featured ANSI SQL support

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

HTTP REST
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary protocol

Open binary protocol

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

3rd party library
C++
Elixir

3rd party library
Go

3rd party library
Java

3rd party library
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party library
Kotlin

3rd party library
Nim

3rd party library
Perl

3rd party library
PHP

3rd party library
Python

3rd party library
R

3rd party library
Ruby

3rd party library
Scala

3rd party library

C
C#
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Lua, C and SQL stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Hash sharding based on virtual buckets

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes, with SQL

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID, read commited

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, cooperative multitasking

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, regular snapshots on disk, write ahead logging

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistence

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication
9 November 2021, Vladimir Perepelytsya, Tarantool (sponsor)

show all

Recent citations in the news

StarRocks Brings Speedy OLAP Database to the Cloud
14 July 2022, Datanami

Prague-based Better Stack raises €18.2M to provide an improved observability stack for developers
22 July 2022, Silicon Canals

Multiple Flaws Uncovered in ClickHouse OLAP Database System for Big Data
16 March 2022, The Hacker News

Two Sizes Fit Most: PostgreSQL and ClickHouse – The New Stack
13 April 2022, thenewstack.io

ClickHouse Raises $250M Series B To Scale Groundbreaking OLAP Database Management System Globally
28 October 2021, Business Wire

provided by Google News

Tarantool: A Lua-based database engine
13 April 2016, Opensource.com

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Developer Advocate/Evangelist - Data Warehouse
TikTok, Mountain View, CA

Devops Engineer
CapeStart, Cambridge, MA

Blue Planet Delivery Engineer
Ciena, Remote

Data Systems Engineer
RingCentral, Remote

Java Engineer (Mid-level)
Ad.net, Remote

Technical Support Engineer
Wallarm, Remote

Middle / Senior Ruby Developer
Wallarm, Remote

Senior QA Engineer (Automation)
Wallarm, Remote

jobs by

Share this page