DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BoltDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BoltDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Atos Standard Common Repository and BoltDB with MongoDB, Kinetica and Adabas.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

An embedded key-value store for Go.

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Key-value store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.85
Rank	#245	Overall
	#36	Key-value stores

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

github.com/boltdb/bolt

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Initial release

2016

2013

Current release

1703

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

BSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Key Value Database Market [2024-2031] | Global Outlook Insight Report
25 September 2023, Benzinga

2030, Key Value Database Market Size | Industry Report 2023
19 September 2023, Benzinga

The Key Value Databases Market 2023 Competitive Landscape: An Overview of Top Regions and Key Players til
1 September 2023, Benzinga

How to Put a GUI on Ansible, Using Semaphore
22 April 2023, The New Stack

RoadRunner Key-Value Cache for Laravel
11 July 2023, Laravel News

provided by Google News

Share this page