DBMS > ArcadeDB vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage

System Properties Comparison ArcadeDB vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare ArcadeDB and Microsoft Azure Table Storage with MongoDB, OrientDB and PostgreSQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Fast and scalable multi-model DBMS, originally forked from OrientDB but most of the code has been rewritten

A Wide Column Store for rapid development using massive semi-structured datasets

Primary database model

Document store
Graph DBMS
Key-value store
Time Series DBMS

in next version

Wide column store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.21
Rank	#350	Overall
	#47	Document stores
	#34	Graph DBMS
	#53	Key-value stores
	#30	Time Series DBMS

Score	5.91
Rank	#70	Overall
	#6	Wide column stores

Website

arcadedb.com

azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/tables

Technical documentation

docs.arcadedb.com

Developer

Arcade Data

Microsoft

Initial release

2021

2012

Current release

September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java VM

hosted

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language, no joins

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
MongoDB API
OpenCypher
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Redis API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
TinkerPop Gremlin

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

Java

.Net
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Implicit feature of the cloud service

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant.

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

relationship in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

optimistic locking

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Access rights based on private key authentication or shared access signatures

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Quick Guide to Azure Storage Pricing
16 May 2023, DevOps.com

How to use Azure Table storage in .Net
14 January 2019, InfoWorld

How to write data to Azure Table Store with an Azure Function
14 April 2017, Experts Exchange

Get to know Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB use cases
11 November 2019, TechTarget

Azure storage prices meet Amazon S3 - Storage - Cloud
31 October 2011, iTnews

provided by Google News

Share this page