DBMS > ArcadeDB vs. Faircom EDGE vs. ObjectBox

System Properties Comparison ArcadeDB vs. Faircom EDGE vs. ObjectBox

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Fast and scalable multi-model DBMS, originally forked from OrientDB but most of the code has been rewritten

FairCom EDGE is an Industry 4.0 solution built to integrate, collect, aggregate and synchronize mission-critical data in edge computing environments

Lightweight, fast on-device database for IoT, Mobile and Embedded devices, persisting and synchronising objects and vectors

Primary database model

Document store
Graph DBMS
Key-value store
Time Series DBMS

in next version

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Object oriented DBMS
Vector DBMS

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.04
Rank	#356	Overall
	#51	Document stores
	#37	Graph DBMS
	#53	Key-value stores
	#36	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.02
Rank	#364	Overall
	#55	Key-value stores
	#153	Relational DBMS

Score	1.07
Rank	#174	Overall
	#6	Object oriented DBMS
	#11	Vector DBMS

Website

arcadedb.com

www.faircom.com/products/faircom-edge

github.com/objectbox
objectbox.io

Technical documentation

docs.arcadedb.com

docs.faircom.com/docs/en/UUID-23d4f1fd-d213-f6d5-b92e-9b7475baa14e.html

docs.objectbox.io

Developer

Arcade Data

FairCom Corporation

ObjectBox Limited

Initial release

2021

1979

2017

Current release

September 2021

V3, October 2020

4.0 (May 2024)

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Restricted, free version available

Bindings are released under Apache 2.0

Apache License 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

ANSI C, C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java VM

Android
Linux

ARM, x86
Raspbian
Windows

Android
Any POSIX system
Docker
iOS
Linux
macOS
QNX
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

yes, ANSI Standard SQL Types

yes, plus "flex" map-like types

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language, no joins

yes

ANSI SQL queries

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
MongoDB API
OpenCypher
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Redis API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
TinkerPop Gremlin

ADO.NET
Direct SQL
IoT Microservice layer
JDBC
MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport)
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

Proprietary native API

Supported programming languages

Java

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
PHP
Python
VB.Net

C
C++
Dart (Flutter)
Go
Java
Kotlin
Python
Swift

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

.Net, JavaScript, C/C++

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

File partitioning

Customizable business rules for partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

Synchronous and asynchronous realtime replication based on transaction logs

Data sync between devices allowing occasional connected databases to work completely offline

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency
Tunable Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

relationship in graphs

yes

when using SQL

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

across SQL and NoSQL

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Fine grained user, group and file access rights managed across SQL (per ANSI standard) and NoSQL.

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

News

Why do we need Edge Computing for a sustainable future?
30 November 2024

IoT, Edge Computing, and Digitalization in Healthcare
22 November 2024

The Embedded Database for C++ and C
11 November 2024

The Critical Role of Databases for Edge AI
11 November 2024

Bi-directional Offline-First Data Sync with MongoDB and ObjectBox
21 October 2024

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Why developers like Apache TinkerPop, an open source framework for graph computing
27 September 2021, AWS Blog

provided by Google News

FairCom kicks off new era of database technology
10 November 2020, PR Newswire

Brokers, Protocols, Platform Move Manufacturing Data
26 July 2023, EE Times

Trend-Setting Products in Data and Information Management for 2023
8 December 2022, Database Trends and Applications

Trend-Setting Products in Data and Information Management for 2024
6 December 2023, Database Trends and Applications

Trend-Setting Products in Data and Information Management for 2022
8 December 2021, Database Trends and Applications

provided by Google News

Realm vs ObjectBox - Write Transactions Comparison
30 January 2023, Netguru

Top 22 Android Libraries for 2025 Every Developer Needs
29 November 2024, Netguru

provided by Google News

Share this page