DBMS > Apache Druid vs. Bangdb vs. Hazelcast

System Properties Comparison Apache Druid vs. Bangdb vs. Hazelcast

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Open-source analytics data store designed for sub-second OLAP queries on high dimensionality and high cardinality data

Converged and high performance database for device data, events, time series, document and graph

A widely adopted in-memory data grid

Primary database model

Relational DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

Document store

JSON support with IMDG 3.12

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	3.20
Rank	#106	Overall
	#54	Relational DBMS
	#7	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.36
Rank	#313	Overall
	#45	Document stores
	#26	Graph DBMS
	#26	Time Series DBMS

Score	7.87
Rank	#56	Overall
	#6	Key-value stores

Website

druid.apache.org

bangdb.com

hazelcast.com

Technical documentation

druid.apache.org/docs/latest/design

docs.bangdb.com

hazelcast.org/imdg/docs

Developer

Apache Software Foundation and contributors

Sachin Sinha, BangDB

Hazelcast

Initial release

2012

2008

Current release

26.0.0, May 2023

BangDB 2.0, October 2021

5.3.1, June 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache license v2

Open Source

BSD 3

Open Source

Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C, C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Unix

Linux

All OS with a Java VM

Data scheme

yes

schema-less columns are supported

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

yes: string, long, double, int, geospatial, stream, events

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

the object must implement a serialization strategy

Secondary indexes

yes

secondary, composite, nested, reverse, geospatial

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL for querying

SQL like support with command line tool

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Proprietary protocol
RESTful HTTP API

JCache
JPA
Memcached protocol
RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

Clojure
JavaScript
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala

C
C#
C++
Java
Python

.Net
C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Event Listeners, Executor Services

Triggers

yes, Notifications (with Streaming only)

yes

Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

manual/auto, time-based

Sharding (enterprise version only). P2P based virtual network overlay with consistent hashing and chord algorithm

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes, via HDFS, S3 or other storage engines

selectable replication factor, Knob for CAP (enterprise version only)

yes

Replicated Map

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Tunable consistency, set CAP knob accordingly

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency selectable by user

Raft Consensus Algorithm

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

one or two-phase-commit; repeatable reads; read commited

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, optimistic concurrency control

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, implements WAL (Write ahead log) as well

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes, run db with in-memory only mode

yes

User concepts

Access control

RBAC using LDAP or Druid internals for users and groups for read/write by datasource and system

yes (enterprise version only)

Role-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

InfluxDB Clustered targets on-premises time-series database deployments
6 September 2023, InfoWorld

What's 'Pipeline-Free' Real-Time Data Analytics?
5 September 2023, The New Stack

Change Data Capture for Real-Time Access to Backend Databases
5 September 2023, The New Stack

Apache Druid Charms in Upper Echelons of OLAP Database ...
3 April 2023, Datanami

Imply Announces Automatic Schema Discovery for Apache Druid ...
6 June 2023, Datanami

provided by Google News

Secoda secures $14M to expand its data cataloging platform
21 September 2023, TechCrunch

In-Memory Data Grid Market is Booming Across the Global Players ...
18 September 2023, Digital Journal

AArete partners with data firm Hazelcast
17 July 2023, Consulting.us

[2023-2031] Event Stream Processing (ESP) System Market Size, Share and Trends
18 September 2023, Benzinga

Hazelcast CEO: Automation Rules The Real-Time Economy
10 December 2022, Forbes

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Druid Data Engineer #23-00077
Abode Techzone LLC, Remote

Mid Node.js Developer Remote
AdTonos, Remote

Weekend Backend Engineer
Sporty Group, Remote

Backend Engineer
Sporty Group, Remote

GCP-Apache Druid engineer
NewEra logic, Irving, TX

jobs by

Share this page