DBMS > AnzoGraph DB vs. Postgres-XL vs. Stardog

System Properties Comparison AnzoGraph DB vs. Postgres-XL vs. Stardog

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization

Based on PostgreSQL enhanced with MPP and write-scale-out cluster features

Enterprise Knowledge Graph platform and graph DBMS with high availability, high performance reasoning, and virtualization

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
RDF store

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS
RDF store

Secondary database models

Document store
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.42
Rank	#292	Overall
	#23	Graph DBMS
	#14	RDF stores

Score	0.76
Rank	#247	Overall
	#115	Relational DBMS

Score	2.30
Rank	#133	Overall
	#10	Graph DBMS
	#6	RDF stores

Website

cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph

www.postgres-xl.org

www.stardog.com

Technical documentation

docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/userdoc/home.htm

www.postgres-xl.org/documentation

docs.stardog.com

Developer

Cambridge Semantics

Stardog-Union

Initial release

2018

2014

since 2012, originally named StormDB

2010

Current release

2.3, January 2021

10 R1, October 2018

7.3.0, May 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free trial version available

Open Source

Mozilla public license

commercial

60-day fully-featured trial license; 1-year fully-featured non-commercial use license for academics/students

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
macOS

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

Schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support

yes

schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

XML type, but no XML query functionality

Import/export of XML data possible

Secondary indexes

yes

supports real-time indexing in full-text and geospatial

SQL

Support of SQL

SPARQL and SPARQL* as primary query language. Cypher preview.

yes

distributed, parallel query execution

Yes, compatible with all major SQL variants through dedicated BI/SQL Server

APIs and other access methods

Apache Mule
gRPC
JDBC
Kafka
OData access for BI tools
OpenCypher
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

GraphQL query language
HTTP API
Jena RDF API
OWL
RDF4J API
Sesame REST HTTP Protocol
SNARL
SPARQL
Spring Data
Stardog Studio
TinkerPop 3

Supported programming languages

C++
Java
Python

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Erlang
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl

.Net
Clojure
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions and aggregates

user defined functions

user defined functions and aggregates, HTTP Server extensions in Java

Triggers

yes

via event handlers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Automatic sharding

horizontal partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication in MPP-Cluster

Multi-source replication in HA-Cluster

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Kerberos/HDFS data loading

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency in MPP-Cluster

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency in HA-Cluster

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

not needed in graphs

yes

relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

MVCC

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

AnzoGraph review: A graph database for deep analytics
14 April 2019, InfoWorld

Cambridge Semantics Fits AnzoGraph DB with More Speed, Free ...
23 January 2020, Solutions Review

Cambridge Semantics Announces Major Upgrades to Its Award ...
23 January 2020, Business Wire

Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query ...
5 March 2018, ZDNet

Knowledge graph evolution: Platforms that speak your language
30 January 2020, ZDNet

provided by Google News

Building a scalable PostgreSQL solution
14 April 2019, Packt Hub

MPP 还是主流架构吗
22 August 2023, CSDN

PostgreSQLをスケールアウトさせるには？ | NTTデータ
16 October 2020, NTT Data

PostgreSQL СУБД
8 June 2020, TAdviser.ru

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Senior Associate, Data Governance - Ontology and Data Modeling
Capital One, New York, NY

Senior Manager, Ontology and Data Modeling
Capital One, McLean, VA

Director, Ontology and Data Modeling
Capital One, McLean, VA

Manager, Data Governance - Ontology and Data Modeling
Capital One, New York, NY

Principal Associate, Ontology and Data Modeling
Capital One, New York, NY

jobs by

Share this page