DBMS > Amazon Redshift vs. Informix

System Properties Comparison Amazon Redshift vs. Informix

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Amazon Redshift and Informix with PostgreSQL, Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools

A secure embeddable database from IBM, positioned besides IBM Db2 as a relatively low-cost product optimized for OLTP and Internet of Things data

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Since Version 12.10 support for JSON/BSON datatypes compatible with MongoDB

Secondary database models

Document store
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

with Informix TimeSeries Extension

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	14.70
Rank	#36	Overall
	#22	Relational DBMS

Score	14.75
Rank	#35	Overall
	#21	Relational DBMS

Website

aws.amazon.com/redshift

www.ibm.com/products/informix

Technical documentation

docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift

informix.hcldoc.com
www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGU8G/welcomeIfxServers.html

Developer

Amazon (based on PostgreSQL)

IBM, HCL Technologies

Effective May 1st, 2017, HCL took on development, technical support, and product management teams, and works jointly with IBM on product strategy, marketing, and sales.

Initial release

2012

1984

Current release

14.10.FC5, November 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free developer edition available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++ and Java

Server operating systems

hosted

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Since Version 12.10 support for JSON/BSON datatypes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

does not fully support an SQL-standard

yes

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
JSON API

MongoDB compatible
MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport)
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC

.Net
C
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

in Python

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

informational only, not enforced by the system

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users with fine-grained authentication, authorization, and auditing controls

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates
12 December 2019, Paul Andlinger

The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years
7 February 2017, Matthias Gelbmann

Increased popularity for consuming DBMS services out of the cloud
2 October 2015, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Configure cross-account access of Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse multi-catalog tables using AWS Glue 5.0 Spark
9 May 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Recap of Amazon Redshift key product announcements in 2024
17 December 2024, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Redshift enhances security by changing default behavior in 2025 | Amazon Web Services
30 January 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Using Amazon S3 Tables with Amazon Redshift to query Apache Iceberg tables | Amazon Web Services
24 March 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Enhance your Amazon Redshift business intelligence workloads with gen AI capabilities using Amazon Q in QuickSight
22 January 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

provided by Google News

Informix 15: Unparalleled Scalability for the Modern Data-Driven World
11 November 2024, IBM

Database Management System Market Projected to Reach USD
5 May 2025, GlobeNewswire

Harry Carlton Doe Obituary - Coppell, TX
16 January 2025, Dignity Memorial

Migrate an Informix database to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL using CData Connect Cloud from within AWS Glue Studio
8 June 2023, Amazon Web Services

IBM Informix review: What you need to know about the software
12 December 2022, TechRepublic

provided by Google News

Share this page