DBMS > Amazon Redshift vs. Datomic vs. InterSystems Caché vs. RavenDB

System Properties Comparison Amazon Redshift vs. Datomic vs. InterSystems Caché vs. RavenDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools

Datomic builds on immutable values, supports point-in-time queries and uses 3rd party systems for durability

A multi-model DBMS and application server

Open Source Operational and Transactional Enterprise NoSQL Document Database

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Key-value store
Object oriented DBMS
Relational DBMS

Document store

Secondary database models

Document store

Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	25.94
Rank	#31	Overall
	#18	Relational DBMS

Score	1.70
Rank	#138	Overall
	#68	Relational DBMS

Score	3.01
Rank	#104	Overall
	#19	Key-value stores
	#1	Object oriented DBMS
	#53	Relational DBMS

Score	3.47
Rank	#94	Overall
	#16	Document stores

Website

aws.amazon.com/redshift

www.datomic.com

www.intersystems.com/products/cache

ravendb.net

Technical documentation

docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift

docs.datomic.com

docs.intersystems.com

ravendb.net/docs

Developer

Amazon (based on PostgreSQL)

Cognitect

InterSystems

Hibernating Rhinos

Initial release

2012

1997

2010

Current release

1.0.6362, January 2022

2018.1.4, May 2020

5.3, November 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

limited edition free

commercial

Open Source

AGPL version 3, commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java, Clojure

Server operating systems

hosted

All OS with a Java VM

AIX
HP Open VMS
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows

Linux
macOS
Raspberry Pi
Windows

Data scheme

yes

depending on used data model

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

restricted

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

does not fully support an SQL-standard

yes

SQL-like query language (RQL)

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

RESTful HTTP API

.NET Client API
JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

.NET Client API
Java Client API
Python Client API
RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC

Clojure
Java

C#
C++
Java

.Net
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

in Python

yes

Transaction Functions

yes

Triggers

By using transaction functions

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

But extensive use of caching in the application peers

none

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

But extensive use of caching in the application peers

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

MapReduce functions can be defined in Linq

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

informational only, not enforced by the system

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

ACID, Cluster-wide transaction available

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

using external storage systems (e.g. Cassandra, DynamoDB, PostgreSQL, Couchbase and others)

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

recommended only for testing and development

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access rights for users, groups and roles

Access control on document level using the Authorization Bundle

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

RavenDB is the pioneer NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID)...
» more

Competitive advantages

RavenDB is easy to setup and secure. You can do it in a matter of minutes . Easy...
» more

Typical application scenarios

IoT for Edge Deployments Fraud Detection Recommendation Engines Product Catalogs...
» more

Key customers

Toyota, Capgemini, Vodafone, Medicaid, Asos, Nomura, RMS Automotive, MSNBC, Pluralsight,...
» more

Market metrics

2 million+ downloads 1000+ customers including Fortune 500 large enterprises
» more

Licensing and pricing models

RavenDB is available on-premise and in the cloud. RavenDB Cloud is available on AWS...
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.