DBMS > Amazon DocumentDB vs. Databend vs. Microsoft SQL Server

System Properties Comparison Amazon DocumentDB vs. Databend vs. Microsoft SQL Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Fast, scalable, highly available, and fully managed MongoDB-compatible database service

An open-source, elastic, and workload-aware cloud data warehouse designed to meet businesses' massive-scale analytics needs at low cost and with low complexity

Microsofts flagship relational DBMS

Primary database model

Document store

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.80
Rank	#126	Overall
	#24	Document stores

Score	0.27
Rank	#290	Overall
	#130	Relational DBMS

Score	774.89
Rank	#3	Overall
	#3	Relational DBMS

Website

aws.amazon.com/documentdb

github.com/datafuselabs/databend
www.databend.com

www.microsoft.com/en-us/sql-server

Technical documentation

aws.amazon.com/documentdb/resources

docs.databend.com

learn.microsoft.com/en-US/sql/sql-server

Developer

Databend Labs

Microsoft

Initial release

2019

2021

1989

Current release

1.0.59, April 2023

SQL Server 2022, November 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

restricted free version is available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Rust

C++

Server operating systems

hosted

hosted
Linux
macOS

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

proprietary protocol using JSON (MongoDB compatible)

CLI Client
JDBC
RESTful HTTP API

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)

Supported programming languages

Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python

Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

C#
C++
Delphi
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Visual Basic

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-availability zones for high availability, asynchronous replication for up to 15 read replicas

none

yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

may be implemented via Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR)

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

typically not used, however similar functionality with DBRef possible

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic single-document operations

yes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles

Users with fine-grained authorization concept, user roles

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019
3 January 2020, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
2 May 2017, Paul Andlinger

Microsoft SQL Server is the DBMS of the Year
4 January 2017, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Amazon DocumentDB Quick Start: Zero Setup with AWS CloudShell
14 March 2025, Amazon Web Services

Use IAM authentication with Amazon DocumentDB (with MongoDB compatibility)
17 October 2024, Amazon Web Services

Powering a Generative AI Platform Using Amazon DocumentDB with tresle.ai | Amazon Web Services
18 April 2025, Amazon Web Services

Optimizing costs on Amazon DocumentDB using event-driven architecture and the AWS EventBridge Terraform module
23 August 2024, Amazon Web Services

Build containerized applications for Amazon DocumentDB that run on Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate
23 October 2024, Amazon Web Services

provided by Google News

Data Bending: Creating Unique Digital Visual Effects
23 April 2020, Red Shark News

Â£1.1 Million in AddisonMckee Tube Bending Technologies Provides Dinex with Outstanding OEM Credentials
24 May 2007, Thomasnet

provided by Google News

Running SQL Server Stretch Failover Cluster Instance on Amazon EC2 | Amazon Web Services
16 May 2025, Amazon Web Services

Why SQL Server Is Still Worth It
24 March 2025, Redmondmag.com

The year ahead for SQL Server: Ground to cloud to fabric
15 January 2025, Microsoft

May 2025 Patch Tuesday Updates Fix 5 Zero-Day Vulnerabilities
14 May 2025, Petri IT Knowledgebase

How to Recover Deleted Data from SQL Server without Backup
22 April 2025, Infosecurity Magazine

provided by Google News

Share this page